Skip to main content

A CTL-Based Logic for Program Abstractions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6188))

Abstract

We define an action-based extension of the branching-time temporal logic CTL which allows path quantifiers to be restricted by formal languages. The main purpose of this logic is its use in abstract interpretation. A reduction from a concrete system to an abstract one may contain spurious traces which can render the verification of the abstract system useless with respect to the concrete one. We pick up the suggestion to verify a modified property on the abstract system instead of the one that the concrete system is supposed to have. The logic introduced here enables a systematic modification of such properties. We present some ways of such a modification which aim at implicitly excluding spurious traces in the verification of abstracted systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Madhusudan, P.: Visibly pushdown languages. In: Proc. 36th Ann. ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, STOC 2004, pp. 202–211 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bosnacki, D., Ioustinova, N., Sidorova, N.: Using fairness to make abstractions work. In: Graf, S., Mounier, L. (eds.) SPIN 2004. LNCS, vol. 2989, pp. 198–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouajjani, A., Esparza, J., Maler, O.: Reachability analysis of pushdown automata: Application to model-checking. In: Mazurkiewicz, A., Winkowski, J. (eds.) CONCUR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1243, pp. 135–150. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Büchi, J.R.: On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic. In: Proc. Congress on Logic, Method, and Philosophy of Science, pp. 1–12. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Synthesis of synchronization skeletons for branching time temporal logic. In: Kozen, D. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement for symbolic model checking. Journal of the ACM 50(5), 752–794 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: Decision procedures and expressiveness in the temporal logic of branching time. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 30, 1–24 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: “sometimes” and “not never” revisited: on branching versus linear time temporal logic. J. ACM 33(1), 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Emerson, E.A., Jutla, C.S.: The complexity of tree automata and logics of programs. In: Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 328–337 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, M.J., Ladner, R.E.: Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 18(2), 194–211 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Löding, C., Lutz, C., Serre, O.: Propositional dynamic logic with recursive programs. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 73(1-2), 51–69 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Löding, C., Serre, O.: Propositional dynamic logic with recursive programs. In: Aceto, L., Ingólfsdóttir, A. (eds.) FOSSACS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3921, pp. 292–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. De Nicola, R., Vaandrager, F.: Action versus state based logics for transition systems. In: Guessarian, I. (ed.) LITP 1990. LNCS, vol. 469, pp. 407–419. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: Proc. 18th Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 1977, Providence, RI, USA, pp. 46–57. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sistla, A.P., Clarke, E.M.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 32(3), 733–749 (1985)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Staiger, L.: Handbook of formal languages. In: ω-languages. Beyond words, vol. 3, pp. 339–387. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Streett, R.S.: Propositional dynamic logic of looping and converse is elementarily decidable. Information and Control 54(1/2), 121–141 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 32(2), 183–221 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Walukiewicz, I.: Pushdown processes: Games and model-checking. Information and Computation 164(2), 234–263 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lange, M., Latte, M. (2010). A CTL-Based Logic for Program Abstractions. In: Dawar, A., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information and Computation. WoLLIC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6188. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13824-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13824-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13823-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13824-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics