Skip to main content

Inductive Generalization of Analytically Learned Goal Hierarchies

  • Conference paper
Book cover Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5989))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe a new approach for learning procedural knowledge represented as teleoreactive logic programs using relational behavior traces as input. This representation organizes task decomposition skills hierarchically and associate explicitly defined goals with them. Our approach integrates analytical learning with inductive generalization in order to learn these skills. The analytical component predicts the goal dependencies in a successful solution and generates a teleoreactive logic program that can solve similar problems by determining the structure of the skill hierarchy and skill applicability conditions (preconditions), which may be overgeneral. The inductive component experiments with these skills on new problems and uses the data collected in this process to refine the preconditions. Our system achieves this by converting the data collected during the problem solving experiments into the positive and negative examples of preconditions that can be learned with a standard Inductive Logic Programming system. We show that this conversion uses one of the main commitments of teleoreactive logic programs: associating all skills with explicitly defined goals. We claim that our approach uses less expert effort compared to a purely inductive approach and performs better compared to a purely analytical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Choi, D., Langley, P.: Learning teleoreactive logic programs from problem solving. In: ILP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3625, pp. 51–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sammut, C., Hurst, S., Kedzier, D., Michie, D.: Learning to fly. In: Sleeman, D., Edwards, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 385–393 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Isaac, A., Sammut, C.: Goal-directed learning to fly. In: Fawcett, T., Mishra, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Könik, T., Laird, J.E.: Learning goal hierarchies from structured observations and expert annotations. Machine Learning 64, 263–287 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Nejati, N., Langley, P., Könik, T.: Learning hierarchical task networks by observation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Conference on Machine Learning (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Genesereth, M.R., Love, N., Pell, B.: General game playing overview of the aaai competition. AI Magazine 26, 62–72 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erol, K., Hendler, J., Nau, D.S.: HTN planning: Complexity and expressivity. In: Procceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nau, D., Au, T.C., Ilghami, O., Kuter, U., Murdock, W., Wu, D., Yaman, F.: SHOP2: An HTN planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20, 379–404 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Waisbrot, N., Kuter, U., Könik, T.: Combining heuristic search with hierarchical task-network planning: A preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nejati, N., Könik, T., Kuter, U.: A goal and dependency-driven algorithm for learning hierarchical task networks. In: Procceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 113–120. ACM, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dejong, G., Mooney, R.: Explanation-based learning: An alternative view. Machine Learning 1(2), 145–176 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Srinivasan, A.: The Aleph Manual, http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/activities/machinelearning/Aleph/aleph.html

  13. Sleeman, D., Langley, P., Mitchell, T.M.: Learning from solution paths: An approach to the credit assignment problem. AI Magazine 3(2) (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Segre, A.M.: ARMS: Acquiring robotic assembly plans. In: De Jong, G. (ed.) Investigating Explanation-Based Learning. Kluwer, Boston (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mooney, R.J., Zelle, J.M.: Integrating ILP and EBL. SIGART Bulletin 5, 12–21 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Estlin, T.A., Mooney, R.J.: Integrating EBL and ILP to acquire control rules for planning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multi-Strategy Learning, pp. 271–279 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reddy, C., Tadepalli, P.: Learning goal-decomposition rules using exercises. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hogg, C., Muñoz Avila, H., Kuter, U.: HTN-MAKER: Learning HTNs with minimal additional knowledge engineering required. In: Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 950–956. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ilghami, O., Muñoz Avila, H., Nau, D., Aha, D.: Learning approximate preconditions for methods in hierarchical plans. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Bonn, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khardon, R.: Learning action strategies for planning domains. Artificial Intelligence 113, 125–148 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Könik, T., Nejati, N., Kuter, U. (2010). Inductive Generalization of Analytically Learned Goal Hierarchies. In: De Raedt, L. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5989. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13840-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13840-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13839-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13840-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics