Abstract
We analyze empirical data of Germany’s largest online social lending platform Smava.de to exemplarily study the contribution of unstructured, ambiguous, or unverified information to trust building in online communities. After controlling for the influence of hard information, we find that textual statements that appeal to social behavior actually affect trust building. However, the evidence is less clear for voluntarily disclosed personal data. Lenders generally seem to give more weight to hard information so that disclosing personal data promises little benefit while potentially exposing borrowers to privacy risks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akerlof, G.A.: The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 488–500 (1970)
Besley, T., Coate, S.: Group lending, repayment incentives and social collateral. Journal of Development Economics 46, 1–18 (1995)
Berger, S., Gleisner, F.: Emergence of financial intermediaries in electronic markets: The case of online P2P lending. BuR - Business Research 2(1), 39–65 (2009)
Ortega, A.C.B., Bell, F.: Online social lending: Borrower-generated content. In: Proc. of Americas Conf. on Inf. Systems (AMCIS), vol. 380 (2008)
Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., Wright, Z.: Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In: Proc. of ACM CHI, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 135–140. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Böhme, R., Pötzsch, S.: Privacy in online social lending. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Privacy Management, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 23–28 (2010)
Chen, N., Ghosh, A., Lambert, N.: Social lending. In: Proc. of ACM EC, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 335–344. ACM Press, New York (2009)
Dyer, J.H., Chu, W.: The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, Korea. Organization Science 14(1), 57–68 (2003)
Eisenbeis, H.: The government crackdown on peer-to-peer lending. The Big Money (March 2009), http://www.thebigmoney.com/print/1674
Everett, C.R.: Group membership, relationship banking and default risk: The case of online social lending (August 2008), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1114428
Freedman, S., Jin, G.Z.: Do social networks solve information problems for peer-to-peer lending? Evidence from Prosper.com (November 2008), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1304138
Granovetter, M.: Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481–510 (1985)
Greiner, M.E., Wang, H.: Building consumer-to-consumer trust in e-finance marketplaces. In: Proc. of Americas Conf. on Inf. Systems (AMCIS), vol. 211 (2007)
Greiner, M.E., Wang, H.: The role of social capital in people-to-people lending marketplaces. In: Proc. of Int’l Conf. on Inf. Systems (ICIS), vol. 29 (2009)
Herzenstein, M., Andrews, R., Dholakia, U., Lyandres, E.: The democratization of personal consumer loans? Determinants of success in online peer-to-peer lending communities (June 2008), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1147856
Hung, Y.-T.C., Dennis, A.R., Robert, L.: Trust in virtual teams: Towards an integrative model of trust formation. In: Proc. of Hawaii Int’l Conf. on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)
Herrero-Lopez, S.: Social interactions in P2P lending. In: Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis, Paris, France (June 2009)
Holsti, O.R.: Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1969)
Kiva.org. Facts & Statistics, http://www.kiva.org/about/facts
Kolm, S.-C.: The logic of good social relations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 71(2), 171–189 (2000)
Petersen, M.A.: Information: Hard and soft. Mimeo (2004)
Pope, D., Syndor, J.: What’s in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from Prosper.com (September 2008), http://wsomfaculty.case.edu/sydnor/prosperpaper.pdf
Ravina, E.: Beauty, personal characteristics and trust in credit markets (December 2007), http://ssrn.com/abstract=972801
Ryan, J., Reuk, K., Wang, C.: To fund or not to fund: Determinants of loan fundability in the Prosper.com marketplace (January 2007), http://www.prosper.com/Downloads/Research/Prosper_Regression_Project-Fundability_Study.pdf
Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M.A., McCarthy, J.D.: The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. Int’l Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62(3), 381–422 (2005)
Scissors, L.E., Gill, A.J., Geraghty, K., Gergle, D.: CMC we trust: The role of similarity. In: Proc. of ACM CHI, pp. 527–536 (2009)
Schlenker, B.R., Helm, B., Tedeschi, J.T.: The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioral trust. Journal of Personality and Social 25(3), 419–427 (1973)
Sobel, J.: Can we trust social capital? Journal of Economic Literature 40(3), 139–154 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pötzsch, S., Böhme, R. (2010). The Role of Soft Information in Trust Building: Evidence from Online Social Lending. In: Acquisti, A., Smith, S.W., Sadeghi, AR. (eds) Trust and Trustworthy Computing. Trust 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6101. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13869-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13869-0_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13868-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13869-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)