Skip to main content

User Testing of Google Reader and RIA Complexity – A Warning

  • Conference paper
  • 1598 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6179))

Abstract

There are many APIs and toolkits available in the wild today that allow developers to build rich sophisticated Web Applications. There are a variety of frameworks and toolkits at use in the wild. While these platforms - in principle - offer the promise of greater functionality and more robust interoperability they also cast a potential shadow of greater complexity and how will this complexity then impact on the user experience for people with disabilities? In tandem, there are many guidelines designed to help make inclusive, accessible and usable designs a reality such as the principles of Universal Design, the WCAG and other international usability standards. [1][2][3].

So how can we ensure that when we build complex Rich Internet Applications (RIAs) that they can be easily used by the widest possible audience, including older people and people with disabilities? A well-established method is to conduct a user test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Centre for Universal Design, http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm

  2. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php

  3. International standards for HCI and usability, http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/r_international.htm

  4. Virzi, R.A., Sorce, J.F., Herbert, L.B.: A Comparison of Three Usability Evaluation Methods: Heuristic, Think-Aloud, and Performance Testing. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, Computer Systems, 309–313

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buur, J., Bagger, K.: Replacing usability testing with user dialogueSource. Communications of the ACM archive 42(5), 63–66 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CFIT User Testing, http://www.cfit.ie/user-testing

  7. User Testing Video Download, http://www.cfit.ie/video/Usability_RIAs_CFIT.wmv

  8. WAI-ARIA, http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria

  9. AXSJAX Framework, http://code.google.com/p/google-axsjax/

  10. Whats new in JAWS 11, http://www.freedomscientific.com/downloads/jaws/JAWS-whats-new.asp

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Connor, J.O. (2010). User Testing of Google Reader and RIA Complexity – A Warning. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6179. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14097-6_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14097-6_71

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14096-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14097-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics