Skip to main content

A Preference Optimization Based Unifying Framework for Supervised Learning Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Preference Learning

Abstract

Supervised learning is characterized by a broad spectrum of learning problems, often involving structured types of prediction, including classification, ranking-based predictions (label and instance ranking), and (ordinal) regression in its various forms. All these different learning problems are typically addressed by specific algorithmic solutions.

In this chapter, we propose ageneral preference learning model (GPLM), which gives an easy way to translate any supervised learning problem and the associated cost functions into sets of preferences to learn from. A large margin principled approach to solve this problem is also proposed.

Examples of how the proposed framework has been effectively used by us to address non-standard real-world applications are reported showing the flexibility and effectiveness of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that this task and the two that follow are conceptually different from the task to decide about the membership of an instance. Here, supervision only gives qualitative information about the fact that some classes are more relevant than others.

  2. 2.

    Note that the same employee can play the role of negative example in several events. Moreover, it might also be a positive example.

  3. 3.

    http://www.wipo.int/classifications/en/

References

  1. F.Aiolli, Large margin multiclass learning: models and algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa, 2004. http://www.di.unipi.it/phd/tesi/tesi_2004/PhDthesisAiolli.ps.gz

  2. F.Aiolli, A preference model for structured supervised learning tasks, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (2005), pp. 557–560

    Google Scholar 

  3. F.Aiolli, R.Cardin, F.Sebastiani, A.Sperduti, Preferential text classification: Learning algorithms and evaluation measures. Inf. Retr. 12(5), 559–580 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F.Aiolli, M.De Filippo, A.Sperduti, Application of the preference learning model to a human resources selection task, in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) (Amsterdam, NL, 2009), pp. 203–210

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.Aiolli, A.Sperduti, Learning preferences for multiclass problems, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2005) pp. 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.J.C. Burges, T.Shaked, E.Renshaw, A.Lazier, M.Deeds, N.Hamilton, G.N. Hullender, Learning to rank using gradient descent, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2005), pp. 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.Chu, S.Sathiya Keerthi, Support vector ordinal regression. Neural Comput. 19(3), 792–815 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. W.W. Cohen, R.E. Schapire, Y.Singer, Learning to order things. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 10 243–270 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. K.Crammer, Y.Singer, Pranking with ranking, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (2002), pp. 641–647

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.Crammer, Y.Singer, A family of additive online algorithms for category ranking. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1025–1058 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. O.Dekel, C.D. Manning, Y.Singer, Log-linear models for label ranking, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.Evgeniou, M.Pontil, T.Poggio, Regularization networks and support vector machines. Adv. Comput. Math. 13, 1–50 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. C.J. Fall, A.Törcsvári, K.Benzineb, G.Karetka, Automated categorization in the International Patent Classification. SIGIR Forum 37(1), 10–25 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y.Freund, R.D. Iyer, R.E. Schapire, Y.Singer, An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4, 933–969 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. T.T. Friess, N.Cristianini, C.Campbell, The kernel adatron algorithm: a fast and simple learning procedure for support vector machines, in Proceedings of International Conference of Machine Learning (ICML) (1998), pp. 188–196

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.T. Friess, N.Cristianini, C.Campbell, Subset ranking using regression, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Theory (COLT) (Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006), pp. 605–619

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.Fürnkranz, E.Hüllermeier, E.Mencía, K.Brinker, Multilabel classification via calibrated label ranking. Mach. Learn. 73(2), 133–153 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.Har-Peled, D.Roth, D.Zimak, Constraint classification for multiclass classification and ranking, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2002), pp. 785–792

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.Herbrich, T.Graepel, P.Bollmann-Sdorra, K.Ober-mayer, Learning a preference relation for information retrieval, in Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop Text Categorization and Machine Learning (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.Herbrich, T.Graepel, K.Obermayer, Large margin rank boundaries for ordinal regression, in Advances in Large Margin Classifiers (MIT, 2000), pp. 115–132

    Google Scholar 

  21. E.Hüllermeier, J.Fürnkranz, W.Cheng, K.Brinker, Label ranking by learning pairwise preferences. Artif. Intell. 172(16–17), 1897–1916 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. T.Joachims, Making large-scale svm learning practical, in Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning ed. by B.Schlkopf, C.Burges, A.Smola (MIT, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. T.Joachims, Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data, in Proceedings of the Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (2002) pp. 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  24. Q.Le, A.Smola, Direct optimization of ranking measures. Technical report, NICTA, Canberra, Australia, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  25. P.Li, C.Burges, Q.Wu, Mcrank: Learning to rank using multiple classification and gradient boosting, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (MIT, 2008), pp.897–904

    Google Scholar 

  26. P.McCullagh, J.A. Nelder, Generalized Linear Models (Chapman & Hall, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.Nallapati, Discriminative models for information retrieval, in Proceedings of the Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (ACM, 2004), pp. 64–71

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.C. Platt, N.Cristianini, J. Shawe-Taylor, Large margin DAGs for multiclass classification, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (1999), pp. 547–533

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.Shashua, A.Levin, Ranking with large margin principle: Two approaches, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (2002), pp. 937–944

    Google Scholar 

  30. I.Tsochantaridis, T.Hofmann, T.Joachims, Y.Altun, Support vector machine learning for interdependent and structured output spaces, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine learning (ICML) (2004), pp. 1453–1484

    Google Scholar 

  31. H.Wu, H.Lu, S.Ma, A practical svm-based algorithm for ordinal regression in image retrieval, in Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Multimedia (2003), pp. 612–621

    Google Scholar 

  32. F.Xia, T.Liu, J.Wang, W.Zhang, H.Li, Listwise approach to learning to rank: theory and algorithm, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2008), pp. 1192–1199

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Aiolli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aiolli, F., Sperduti, A. (2010). A Preference Optimization Based Unifying Framework for Supervised Learning Problems. In: Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E. (eds) Preference Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14125-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14125-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14124-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14125-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics