Skip to main content

Forbidding Undesirable Agreements: A Dependence-Based Approach to the Regulation of Multi-agent Systems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6181))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The purpose of this contribution is to set up a language to evaluate the results of concerted action among interdependent agents against predetermined properties that we can recognise as desirable from a deontic point of view. Unlike the standard view of logics to reason about coalitionally rational action, the capacity of a set of agents to take a rational decision will be restricted to what we will call agreements, that can be seen as solution concepts to a dependence structure present in a certain game. The language will identify in concise terms those agreements that act accordingly or disaccordingly with the desirable properties arbitrarily set up in the beginning, and will reveal, by logical reasoning, a variety of structural properties of this type of collective action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ågotnes, T., Wooldridge, M., van der Hoek, W.: On the logic of coalitional games. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), Hakodate, Japan, May 2006, pp. 153–160. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldewereld, H., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Rational teams: Logical aspects of multi-agent systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 63(2,3), 159–183 (2004)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. In: FOCS ’97: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Washington, DC, USA, p. 100. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., Xu, M.: Facing The Future: Agents And Choices In Our Indeterminist World. Oxford University Press, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borgo, S.: Coalitions in action logic. In: IJCAI, pp. 1822–1827 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broersen, J., Mastop, R., Meyer, J.-J., Turrini, P.: A deontic logic for socially optimal norms. In: van der Meyden, R., van der Torre, L. (eds.) DEON 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5076, pp. 218–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Broersen, J., Mastop, R., Meyer, J.-J., Turrini, P.: A modal representation of strategic reasoning. Technical Report UU-CS-2009-014, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castelfranchi, C.: Modelling social action for ai agents. Artificial Intelligence 103, 157–182 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Castelfranchi, C.: The micro-macro constitution of power. Protosociology 18-19, 208–265 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castelfranchi, C., Cesta, A., Miceli, M.: Dependence relations among autonomous agents. In: Decentralized A.I.-3. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman, J.: Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Harvard (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grossi, D., Turrini, P.: Dependence theory via game theory. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Highsmith, P.: Strangers on a Train. Nationwide Book Service (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kooi, B., Tamminga, A.: Conflicting obligations in multi-agent deontic logic. In: Goble, L., Meyer, J.-J.C. (eds.) DEON 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4048, pp. 175–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer, J.C.: A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic. Notre Dame J. of Formal Logic 29(1), 109–136 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer, J.-J.C., Wieringa, R.J.: Deontic logic: a concise overview. pp. 3–16 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parikh, R.: The logic of games and its applications. In: Selected papers of the international conference on “foundations of computation theory” on Topics in the theory of computation, New York, NY, USA, pp. 111–139. Elsevier North-Holland, Inc., Amsterdam (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pauly, M.: Logic for Social Software. ILLC Dissertation Series (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sergot, M.J., Craven, R.: The deontic component of action language nC+. In: Goble, L., Meyer, J.-J.C. (eds.) DEON 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4048, pp. 222–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Turrini, P., Broersen, J., Mastop, R., Meyer, J.-J.C.: An update operator for strategic ability. In: He, X., Horty, J., Pacuit, E. (eds.) LORI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5834, pp. 292–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. van Benthem, J.: In praise of strategies. Research Report (2007), http://www.illc.uva.nl/Publications/ResearchReports/PP-2008-03.text.pdf

  25. van der Hoek, W., Jamroga, W., Wooldridge, M.: A logic for strategic reasoning. In: AAMAS ’05: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 157–164. ACM, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Turrini, P., Grossi, D., Broersen, J., Meyer, JJ.C. (2010). Forbidding Undesirable Agreements: A Dependence-Based Approach to the Regulation of Multi-agent Systems. In: Governatori, G., Sartor, G. (eds) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. DEON 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6181. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14182-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14183-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics