Skip to main content

Dependency Structures Derived from Minimalist Grammars

  • Conference paper
The Mathematics of Language (MOL 2009, MOL 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6149))

Abstract

This paper provides an interpretation of Minimalist Grammars [16],[17] in terms of dependency structures. Under this interpretation, merge operations derive projective dependency structures, and movement operations introduce both non-projectivity and illnestedness. This new characterization of the generative capacity of Minimalist Grammar makes it possible to discuss the linguistic relevance of non-projectivity and illnestedness. This in turn provides insight into grammars that derive structures with these properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chomsky, N.: The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Boston (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Gärtner, H.M., Michaelis, J.: Some remarks on locality conditions and Minimalist Grammars. In: Sauerland, U., Gärtner, H.M. (eds.) Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, pp. 161–195. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg, A.: Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guéron, J., May, R.: Extraposition and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 1–32 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hajič, J., Panevová, J., Hajičová, E., Sgall, P., Pajas, P., Štěpánek, J., Havelka, J., Mikulová, M.: Prague dependency treebank 2.0 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harkema, H.: A characterization of minimalist languages. In: de Groote, P., Morrill, G., Retoré, C. (eds.) LACL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2099, p. 193. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kayne, R.S.: The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhlmann, M.: Dependency structures and lexicalized grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Universität des Saarlandes (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhlmann, M., Nivre, J.: Mildly non-projective dependency structures. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006, pp. 507–514 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maier, W., Lichte, T.: Characterizing discontinuity in constituent treebanks. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Formal Grammar (2009) http://webloria.loria.fr/~degroote/FG09/Maier.pdf

  11. Michaelis, J.: Derivational minimalism is mildly context-sensitive. In: Moortgat, M. (ed.) LACL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2014, p. 179. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Michaelis, J.: On formal properties of Minimalist Grammars. In: Linguistics in Potsdam, vol. 13, Universitätsbibliothek Publikationsstelle, Potsdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nivre, J.: Inductive Dependency Parsing. In: Text, Speech and Language Technology, Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Satta, G.: Recognition of linear context-free rewriting systems. In: Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguists (ACL), pp. 89–95 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seki, H., Matsumura, T., Fujii, M., Kasami, T.: On multiple context-free grammars. Theoretical Computer Science 88(2), 191–229 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Stabler, E.P.: Derivational minimalism. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1328, pp. 68–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Stabler, E.P., Keenan, E.: Structural similarity within and among languages. Theoretical Computer Science 293(2), 345–363 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Tesnière, L.: Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Editions Klincksiek (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vijay-shanker, K., Weir, D.J., Joshi, A.K.: Characterizing structural descriptions produced by various grammatical formalisms. In: Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguists (ACL), pp. 104–111 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boston, M.F., Hale, J.T., Kuhlmann, M. (2010). Dependency Structures Derived from Minimalist Grammars. In: Ebert, C., Jäger, G., Michaelis, J. (eds) The Mathematics of Language. MOL MOL 2009 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14321-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14322-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics