Abstract
While research interest is building in the role and effectiveness of electronic based peer feedback (Peer e-Feedback) in the context of L1/L2 English writing, that of Chinese language education at sub-degree level has been neglected. This paper seeks to address this shortfall by examining aspects of how sub-degree level students at a Hong Kong Community College respond to peer roles in the context of e-feedback to written work in a Wiki-supported Chinese language class. The work focuses on identifying the predominant commentary styles employed in a Wiki-supported peer-reviewed writing environment (WPWE) and also gives attention to the question of Gender to probe features and scope, similarities and differences displayed between female and male students. Among the patterns identified was the trend to produce feedback in a descending order, viz: (1) offering a solution; (2) identification of a problem/good point; (3) explanation; (4) localization; and (5) elaboration. Some gender differences emerged e.g. males tended to offer ‘specific suggestions’ more readily than female students. Interestingly and importantly, both genders demonstrated inabilities and or reluctance to offer requests for elaboration – evidence that some well designed training may be desired before conducting online peer-reviewed writing activity. It was evident too, that positive feedback outnumbered negative feedback even when some helpful corrective criticism was clearly needed and appropriate. Overall, the many positives far outweighed some negatives in the educational value of Peer e-feedback as a useful tool in Chinese language education. The study also showed that there is a need to further refine and clearly define some of the terminology now appearing in this important area of research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arndt, V.: What writing teacher can learn from their students. In: Lau, M., Murphy (eds.) Developing Writing: Purposes and Practices, pp. 98–118. Government Printer, Hong Kong (1992)
Beach, R., Friedrich, T.: Response to Writing. In: MacArthur, C.A., Graham, S., Fitzgerald, J. (eds.) Handbook of Writing Research, pp. 222–234. Guilford, New York (2006)
Chi, M.T.H.: Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10, 33–49 (1996)
Cho, K., Schunn, C.D., Charney, D.: Commenting on writing: typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication 23(3), 260–294 (2006)
Cho, K., MacArthur, C.: Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 1–11 (2009)
Ferris, D.R.: The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31(2), 315–339 (1997)
Ferris, D.R.: Treatment of error in the secondary language student writing. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2002)
Ferris, D.R.: Response to student writing. In: Implications for Secondary Language Students. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2003)
Flower, L., Hayes, J.R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., Stratman, J.: Detection, diagnosis and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication 37, 16–55 (1986)
Guardado, M., Ling, S.: ESL student’s experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition 24, 443–461 (2007)
Garratt, L.: Peer feedback in writing: is it ‘culturally appropriate’ for Hong Kong Chinese adult learners. Occasional Papers in English Language Teaching 5, 97–118 (1995)
Hayes, J.R., Flower, L.S.: Identifying the organization of writing processes. In: Gregg, L.W., Steinberg, E.R. (eds.) Cognitive Process in Writing: An Interdisciplinary Approach, pp. 3–30. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1980)
Ho, M.C., Savignon, S.J.: Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal 24(2), 269–290 (2007)
Kamler, B.: Gender and genre in early writing. Linguistics and Education 6(2), 153–182 (1994)
Kanaris, A.: Gendered journeys: Children’s writing and the construction of gender. Language and Education 13(4), 254–268 (1999)
Lee, I.: Peer reviews in a Hong Kong Tertiary Classroom. TESL Canada Journal 15(1), 58–69 (1997)
Leung, L.L.: Interactive revision instruction: teacher and peer feedback in teaching reply letters (寫作修改的互動——回訴信寫作中的教師評估與同儕評估). In: Proceedings of the Second Teaching and Learning Symposium. University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong (2004)
Liu, J., Sadler, R.W.: The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2, 193–227 (2003)
Miao, Y., Badger, R., Zhen, Y.: A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 15, 179–200 (2006)
Nelson, M.M., Schunn, C.D.: The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instruction Science 37, 375–401 (2009)
Paulus, T.M.: The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(30), 265–289 (1999)
Peterson, S.: Influence of Gender on Writing Development. In: MacArthur, C.A., Graham, S., Fitzgerald, J. (eds.) Handbook of Writing Research, pp. 311–323. Guilford, New York (2006)
Zhu, W.: Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Secondary Language Writing 10, 251–276 (2001)
Shum, S.K.: A study on the effects of different methods of evaluation of senior secondary school Chinese Composition (四種中文作文評改法對高中學生的效應). Educational Research Journal 7, 19–20 (1992)
Smith, S.: The role of technical expertise in engineering and writing teachers’ evaluations of students’ writing. Written Communication 20, 37–80 (2003)
Sommers, N.: Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication 31, 378–388 (1980)
Steehouder, M., Jansen, C., Maat, K., van de Staak, J., Woudstra, E.: Leren Communiceren. Wolters-Norrdhoff, Groningen (1992)
Sumida, A.Y.: Reading a child’s writing as a social text. Language Arts 77(4), 309–315 (2000)
Siu, P.K., Ho, M.K.: Analytical study of student ability in error correction of the use of the words, phrases, and sentence structure (中學生修改錯別字、錯詞、錯句能力之研究). Educational Journal 9, 13–21 (1981)
Tuzi, F.: The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computer and Composition 21, 217–235 (2004)
Truscott, J.: The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46(2), 327–369 (1996)
Tseng, S.C., Tsai, C.C.: On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education 49, 1161–1174 (2007)
Tsui, B.M., Ng, M.: Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing 9(2), 147–170 (2000)
van den Berg, I., Admirall, W.F., Pilot, A.: Designing student peer assessment in higher education: analysis of written and oral peer feedback. Teaching in Higher Education 11(2), 135–147 (2006)
van der Pol, J., van den Berg, B.A.M., Admirall, W.F., Simons, P.R.J.: The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education 51, 1804–1817 (2008)
Zhao, Y.: The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunication 4(4), 311–345 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leung, K., Chan, M., Maxwell, G., Poon, T. (2010). A Qualitative Analysis of Sub-degree Students Commentary Styles and Patterns in the Context of Gender and Peer e-Feedback. In: Tsang, P., Cheung, S.K.S., Lee, V.S.K., Huang, R. (eds) Hybrid Learning. ICHL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14656-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14657-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)