Skip to main content

Participatory Design of Public Sector Services

  • Conference paper
Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (EGOVIS 2010)

Abstract

This paper describes a methodology for the participatory design of services in the public sector. The stakeholders participating in the design include three major players, the public which uses the service, the government body which sponsors and finances the service, and the organization (government or third party) that delivers the service. We propose a method for a) gathering the – possibly conflicting – requirements for a service from the three stakeholders, b) representing the design alternatives and their levels of requirement satisfaction, and c) generating a simulation model of the service delivery process for the different design alternatives. The method is illustrated by a practical example based on a real government service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OECD - Modernising government: the way forward, Paris, France (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shostack, G.L., Kingman-Brundage, J.: How to design service. In: Congram, C., Freidman, M. (eds.) The AMA Handbook for the Service Industries, AMACOM, New York, pp. 243–261 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shostack, G.L.: Designing Services that Deliver. Harvard Business Review 62, 133–139 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M.J.: Services marketing, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L., Parasuraman, A.: The behavioral consequences of service quality. J. Mark. 60, 31–46 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kingman-Brundage, J.: The ABCs of Service System Blueprinting. In: Designing a Winning Service Strategy: American Marketing (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cole, M., Parstons, G.: Unlocking Public Value: A New Model For Achieving High Performance In Public Service Organizations. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. The User Challenge Benchmarking: The Supply Of Online Public Services, Capgemini, 7th edn. (2007), http://www.epractice.eu/files/media/media1673.pdf

  9. EU: Study on the Measurement of User Satisfaction and Impact in the EU 27 – Draft Final Report (2009), http://www.epractice.eu/en/library/281909

  10. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., et al.: New Public Management Is Dead - Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(3), 467–494 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pascu, C., Osimo, D., et al.: Social computing: implications for the EU social innovation landscape. Foresight 10(1) (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tapscott, D., Williams, A.D.: WIKINOMICS – How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, Portfolio, Published by Penguin Group (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osimo, D.: Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? European Commission Joint Research Centre Scientific and Technical Reports (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dietrich, B.: Resource Planning for Business Services. Communications of the ACM 49(7), 62–64 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Banavar, G., Hartman, A., Ramaswamy, L., Zherebtsov, A.: A formal model for service delivery. Handbook for Service Science (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agranoff, R., McGuire, M.: Agranoff and McGuire 2003–Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Theory and Research 11(3), 295–326 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramanathan, et al.: Adaptive IT Architecture as a Catalyst for Network Capability in Government. In: Saha, P. (ed.) Advances in Government Enterprise Architecture. Idea Group Publisher (2008) (with Ramnath, R., Desai, A.)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klems, M., Nimis, J., Tai, S.: Do Clouds Compute? A Framework for Estimating the Value of Cloud Computing. In: 7th Workshop on E-Business, WEB 2008, Revised Selected Papers, Paris, France, December 13, pp. 110–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saaty, T.: Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Services Sciences 1(1), 83–98 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Electronic Frontier Foundation, Complaint for Injunctive Relief (2009), http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/social_network/social_networking_FOIA_complaint_final.pdf

  21. Charalabidis, Y., Lampathaki, F., Sarantis, D., Sourouni, A.M., Mouzakitis, S., Gionis, G., Koussouris, S., Ntanos, C., Tsiakaliaris, C., Tountopoulos, V., Askounis, D.: The Greek Electronic Government Interoperability Framework: Standards and Infrastructures for One-Stop Service Provision. In: The Panhellenic Conference of Informatics (PCI 2008), August 25-28. IEEE Publications, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. IDABC, European Interoperability Framework for pan-European e-Government Services, Version 1.0 (2004), http://europa.eu.int/idabc/en/document/3761 (retrieved)

  23. Charalabidis, Y., Lampathaki, F., Psarras, J.: Combination of Interoperability Registries with Process and Data Management Tools for Governmental Services Transformation. In: 42nd Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), January 3-5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. What is web 2.0, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

  25. Dhanesha, K.A., Hartman, A., Jain, A.N.: A model for designing generic services. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 435–442 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cook, H.E.: Product Management: Value, Quality, Cost, Price, Profit and Organization, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Downen, T.: A Multi-Attribute Value Assessment Method for the Early Product Development Phase with Application to the Business Airplane Industry, PhD thesis, Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (February 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mumford, E.: Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis: The ETHICS Approach, http://www.enid.u-net.com/C1book1.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hartman, A. et al. (2010). Participatory Design of Public Sector Services. In: Andersen, K.N., Francesconi, E., Grönlund, Å., van Engers, T.M. (eds) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6267. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15172-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15172-9_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15171-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15172-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics