Skip to main content

On the Benefits of Keyword Spreading in Sponsored Search Auctions: An Experimental Analysis

  • Conference paper
Book cover E-Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 61))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Sellers of goods or services wishing to participate in sponsored search auctions (SSA) must define a pool of keywords that are matched on-line to the queries submitted by the users to a search engine. Sellers must also define the value of their bid to the search engine for showing their advertisements in case of a query-keyword match. In order to optimize its revenue a seller might decide to substitute a keyword with a high cost, thus likely to be the object of intense competition, with sets of related keywords that collectively have lower cost while capturing an equivalent volume of user clicks. This technique is called keyword spreading and has recently attracted the attention of several researchers in the area of sponsored search auctions. In this paper we describe an experimental benchmark that, through large scale realistic simulations, allows us to pin-point the potential benefits/drawbacks of keyword spreading for the players using this technique, for those not using it, and for the search engine itself. Experimental results reveal that keyword spreading is generally convenient (or non-damaging) to all parties involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abhishek, V., Hosanagar, K.: Keyword Generation for Search Engine Advertising using Semantic Similarity between Terms. In: ICEC 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams, Z.: Revenue maximization when bidders have budgets. In: Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM SODA ’06 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams, Z., Mendelevitch, O., Tomlin, J.: Optimal delivery of sponsored search advertisements subject to budget constraints. In: Proc. of the 8th ACM EC, San Diego, California, pp. 272–278 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Acharya, S., Krishnamurthy, P., Deshpande, K., Yan, T.W., Chang, C.C.: A Simulation Framework for Evaluating Designs for Sponsored Search Markets. In: WWW 2007 Sponsored Search Auctions Workshop (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aggarwal, G., Goel, A., Motwani, R.: Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM EC, pp. 1–7 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amer-Yahia, S., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D.M.: Towards a generic bidding standard for online advertising. In: Fourth Workshop on Ad Auctions (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Auerbach, J., Galenson, J., Sundararajan, M.: An empirical analysis of return on investment maximization in sponsored search auctions. In: Proc. of ADKDD ’08, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 1–9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Budinich, M., Codenotti, B., Geraci, F., Pellegrini, M.: On the benefits of keyword spreading in sponsored search auctions: an experimental analysis, Institute for Informatics and Telematics of CNR, TR IIT-10/2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cary, M., Das, A., Edelman, B., Giotis, I., Heimerl, K., Karlin, A.R., Mathieu, C., Schwarz, M.: On Best-Response Bidding in GSP Auctions National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 13788 (February 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke, E.H.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11, 17–33 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhillon, I.S., Mallela, S., Kumar, R.: Enhanced word clustering for hierarchical text classification. In: Proc. of 8th ACM SIGKDD, pp. 191–200 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., Schwarz, M.: Internet advertising and the Generalized Second Price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97(1), 242–259 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feldman, J., Muthukrishnan, S., Pal, M., Stein, C.: Budget optimization in search-based advertising auctions. In: Proc. of the 8th ACM EC, San Diego, California, June, pp. 40–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geraci, F., Pellegrini, M., Pisati, P., Sebastiani, F.: A scalable algorithm for high-quality clustering of web snippets. In: Proc. ACM SAC ’06, Dijoin, France (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gonen, R., Pavlov, E.: An Adaptive Sponsored Search Mechanism delta-Gain Truthful in Valuation, Time, and Budget. In: Deng, X., Graham, F.C. (eds.) WINE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4858, pp. 341–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez, T.F.: Clustering to Minimize the Maximum Intercluster Distance. Theor. Comp. Sci. 38(2/3), 293–306 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghose, A., Yang, S.: An empirical analysis of sponsored search performance in search engine advertising. In: Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Web Search and Web Data Mining WSDM ’08, New York, pp. 241–250 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Groves, T.: Efficient collective choice when compensation is possible. Review of Economic Studies 46, 227–241 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kitts, B., LeBlanc, B.J.: A Trading Agent and Simulator for Keyword Auctions. In: Proceedigns of AAMAS 2004, pp. 228–235 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lahaie, S.: An analysis of alternative slot auction designs for sponsored search. In: Proc. of ACM EC, pp. 218–227 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lahaie, S., Pennock, D.M., Saberi, A., Vohra, R.V.: Sponsored search auctions. In: Algorithmic Game Theory, ch. 28, pp. 699–716. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, H., Abe, N.: Word clustering and disambiguation based on co-occurrence data. In: Proc. of the 17th Intl. Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pp. 749–755 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mehta, A., Saberi, A., Vazirani, U.: Adwords and Generalized Online Matching, J. of ACM 54(5) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mizuta, H., Steiglitz, K.: Agent-based simulation of dynamic online auctions. In: Proc. of the 32nd Conference on Winter Simulation, Orlando, Florida, San Diego, CA., December 10-13 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, G.A., Fellbaum, C., Tengi, R., Wakefield, P., Poddar, R., Langone, H., Haskell, B.: WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Princeton University, Princeton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database. Int. J. of Lexicography (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richardson, M., Dominowska, E., Ragno, R.: Predicting clicks: estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In: Proc. WWW 2007, pp. 521–530 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robu, V., Bohte, S., La Poutre, J.A.: The Complex Dynamics of Sponsored Search Markets. In: Cao, L., Gorodetsky, V., Liu, J., Weiss, G., Yu, P.S. (eds.) Agents and Data Mining Interaction. LNCS, vol. 5680, pp. 183–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Rusmevichientong, P., Williamson, D.P.: An adaptive algorithm for selecting profitable keywords for search-based advertising services. In: ACM EC 2006, pp. 260–269 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Varian, H.R.: Position auctions. Int. J. of Industrial Organization 25, 1163–1178 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. of Finance 16, 8–37 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Budinich, M., Codenotti, B., Geraci, F., Pellegrini, M. (2010). On the Benefits of Keyword Spreading in Sponsored Search Auctions: An Experimental Analysis. In: Buccafurri, F., Semeraro, G. (eds) E-Commerce and Web Technologies. EC-Web 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 61. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15208-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15208-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15207-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15208-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics