Skip to main content

Improving Search in Tag-Based Systems with Automatically Extracted Keywords

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6291))

Abstract

Tag-based systems are used by millions of web users to tag, save and share items. User-defined tags, however, are so variable in quality that searching on these tags alone is unsatisfactory. One way to improve search in bookmarking systems is by adding more metadata to the user-created tags to enhance tag quality. The additional metadata we have used is based on document content and largely avoids the idiosyncratic and ambiguous terms too often evident in user-created tags. Such an approach adds value by incorporating information about the content of the resource while retaining the original user-created tags.

This paper describes how users’ tags can be enhanced with metadata automatically extracted from the original document. An experiment comparing search based only on user-created tags with search using an automatically enhanced tag set, demonstrates how incorporating the extra tags can offer significant benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alag, S.: Collective Intelligence in Action. Manning, Greenwich CT (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Khalifa, H., Davis, H.: Folksonomies versus Automatic Keyword Extraction: An Empirical Study. In: IADIS Web Applications and Research (2006), http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14292/

  3. Awawdeh, R., Anderson, T.: Improved search in tag-Based systems. In: ISDA 2009 - 9TH International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Pisa, pp. 288–293 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bao, S., Wu, X., Fei, B., Xu, G., Su, Z., Yu, Y.: Optimizing web search using social annotations. In: Proc. of WWW 2007, pp. 501–510 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Begelman, G.: Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space (2006), www.pui.ch/phred/automated_tag_clustering/automated_tag_clustering.pdf

  6. Berendt, B., Hanser, C.: Tags are not Metadata, - but Just More Content – to Some People (2007), http://www.icwsm.org/papers/2-Berendt-Hanser.pdf

  7. Brooks, C., Montanez, N.: Improved annotation of the blogspere via autotagging and hierarchical clustering. In: WWW 2006: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, pp. 625–632 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Golder, S., Huberman, B.: The structure of collaborative tagging systems. HP labs (2006), http://www.citeulike.org/user/zelig/article/305755

  9. Guy, M., Tonkin, E.: Folksonomies: Tidying up Tags. D-Lib Magazine (2006), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html

  10. Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., Stumme, G.: Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 411–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Krause, B., Hotho, A., Stumme, G.: A comparision of Social Bookmarking with Traditional Search (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kipp, M.E.I.: Searching with Tags: Do Tags Help Users Find Things? In: 10th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Macgregor, G., McCulloch, E.: Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review 55(5), 291–300 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michlmayr, E.: A Case Study on Emergent Semantics in Communities. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quintarelli, E.: Folksonomies: power to the people (2005), http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm

  16. Yang, K.: Information retrieval on the Web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 39(1), 33–80 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. http://delicious.com/

  18. http://www.ebizmba.com

  19. http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2009/08/term_extraction_stays.html

  20. http://www.stumbleupon.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Awawdeh, R., Anderson, T. (2010). Improving Search in Tag-Based Systems with Automatically Extracted Keywords. In: Bi, Y., Williams, MA. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15279-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15280-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics