Abstract
The categorization of our environment into feature types is an essential prerequisite for cartography, geographic information retrieval, routing applications, spatial decision support systems, and data sharing in general. However, there is no a priori conceptualization of the world and the creation of features and types is an act of cognition. Humans conceptualize their environment based on multiple criteria such as their cultural background, knowledge, motivation, and particularly by space and time. Sharing and making these conceptualizations explicit in a formal, unambiguous way is at the core of semantic interoperability. One way to cope with semantic heterogeneities is by standardization, i.e., by agreeing on a shared conceptualization. This bears the danger of losing local diversity. In contrast, this work proposes the use of microtheories for Spatial Data Infrastructures, such as INSPIRE, to account for the diversity of local conceptualizations while maintaining their semantic interoperability at a global level. We introduce a novel methodology to structure ontologies by spatial and temporal aspects, in our case administrative boundaries, which reflect variations in feature conceptualization. A local, bottom-up approach, based on non-standard inference, is used to compute global feature definitions which are neither too broad nor too specific. Using different conceptualizations of rivers and other geographic feature types, we demonstrate how the present approach can improve the INSPIRE data model and ease its adoption by European member states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kuhn, W.: Semantic engineering. In: Navratil, G. (ed.) Research Trends in Geographic Information Science, pp. 63–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Fisher, P.: Sorites paradox and vague geographies. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 113, 7–18 (2000)
Smith, B., Mark, D.M.: Do mountains exist? towards an ontology of landforms. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20(2), 411–427 (2003)
Mark, D.M.: Toward a theoretical framework for geographic entity types. In: Campari, I., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1993. LNCS, vol. 716, pp. 270–283. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Bennett, B., Mallenby, D., Third, A.: An ontology for grounding vague geographic terms. In: Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference (FOIS 2008), vol. 183, pp. 280–293. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)
Smith, B., Mark, D.M.: Ontology and geographic kinds. In: International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 308–320 (1998)
Frank, A.: A linguistically justified proposal for a spatiotemporal ontology. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Egenhofer, M., Mark, D.M.: Naive geography. In: Kuhn, W., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Bishr, Y.: Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to gis interoperability. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12(4), 299–314 (1998)
Comber, A., Fisher, P.: What is land cover? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32, 199–209 (2005)
Kuhn, W.: Geospatial semantics: Why, of what and how? Journal of Data Semantics III, 1–24 (2005)
Lund, H.G.: Definitions of forest, deforestation, afforestation, and reforestation. Technical report, Forest Information Services (2009), http://home.comcast.net/~gyde/DEFpaper.htm
Janowicz, K., Maue, P., Wilkes, M., Schade, S., Scherer, F., Braun, M., Dupke, S., Kuhn, W.: Similarity as a quality indicator in ontology engineering. In: Eschenbach, C., Grueninger, M. (eds.) 5th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2008), pp. 92–105. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)
Uschold, M.: Creating, integrating and maintaining local and global ontologies. In: Horn, W. (ed.) Proceedings of 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000). IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)
McCarthy, J.: Generality in artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM 30, 1030–1035 (1987)
Wachsmuth, I.: The concept of intelligence in ai. Prerational Intelligence – Adaptive Behavior and Intelligent Systems without Symbols and Logic 1, 43–55 (2000)
Smith, B., Casati, R.: Naive physics: An essay in ontology. Philosophical Psychology 7/2, 225–244 (1994)
Grau, B., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: A logical framework for modularity of ontologies. In: 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 183–196 (2007)
Bateman, J., Borgo, S., Luettich, K., Masolo, C., Mossakowski, T.: Ontological modularity and spatial diversity. Spatial Cognition and Computation 7, 97–128 (2007)
Hois, J., Bhatt, M., Kutz, O.: Modular ontologies for architectural design. In: Ferrario, R., Oltramari, A. (eds.) Formal Ontologies Meet Industry, pp. 66–78. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)
Kokla, M., Kavouras, M.: Fusion of top-level and geographic domain ontologies based on context formation and complementarity. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15, 679–687 (2001)
Kavouras, M., Kokla, M.: A method for the formalization and integration of geographic categorizations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16, 439–453 (2002)
Guha, R., Mccool, R., Fikes, R.: Contexts for the semantic web. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Janowicz, K.: The role of place for the spatial referencing of heritage data. In: The Cultural Heritage of Historic European Cities and Public Participatory GIS Workshop, The University of York, UK, September 17-18 (2009)
Küsters, R.: Non-Standard Inferences in Description Logics. In: Küsters, R. (ed.) Non-Standard Inferences in Description Logics. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2100, p. 33. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Cycorp: Contexts in cyc (2002), http://www.cyc.com/cycdoc/course/contexts-basic-module.html
Hovy, E.: Comparing Sets of Semantic Relations in Ontologies. In: The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Brodaric, B., Gahegan, M.: Distinguishing instances and evidence of geographical concepts for geospatial database design. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 22–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Egenhofer, M.: Toward the semantic geospatial web. In: GIS 2002: Proceedings of the 10th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems, pp. 1–4. ACM, New York (2002)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
McCarthy, J., Buvac, S.: Formalizing context (expanded notes) (1996)
Janowicz, K., Kessler, C., Schwarz, M., Wilkes, M., Panov, I., Espeter, M., Baeumer, B.: Algorithm, implementation and application of the sim-dl similarity server. In: Fonseca, F., RodrÃguez, M.A., Levashkin, S. (eds.) GeoS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4853, pp. 128–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Janowicz, K., Wilkes, M.: SIM-DL_A: A novel semantic similarity measure for description logics reducing inter-concept to inter-instance similarity. In: Aroyo, L., Traverso, P., Ciravegna, F., Cimiano, P., Heath, T., Hyvönen, E., Mizoguchi, R., Oren, E., Sabou, M., Simperl, E. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 353–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Taylor, M., Stokes, R.: Up the creek: What is wrong with the definition of a river in new south wales? Environment and Planning Law Journal 22(3), 193–211 (2005)
Taylor, M.P., Stokes, R.: When is a river not a river? consideration of the legal definition of a river for geomorphologists practising in new south wales, australia. Australian Geographer 36(2), 183–200 (2005)
Kuhn, W.: Ontologies in support of activities in geographical space. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7), 613–631 (2001)
Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltrami, A.: Ontology library deliverable d18. Technical report, ISTC-CNR (2003)
Kuhn, W.: A functional ontology of observation and measurement. In: Janowicz, K., Raubal, M., Levashkin, S. (eds.) GeoS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5892, pp. 26–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Cohen, W., Borgida, A., Hirsh, H.: Computing least common subsumers in description logics. In: Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 754–760. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Baader, F., Sertkaya, B., Turhan, A.Y.: Computing the least common subsumer w.r.t. a background terminology. Journal of Applied Logic 5(3), 392–420 (2007)
Janowicz, K., Wilkes, M., Lutz, M.: Similarity-based information retrieval and its role within spatial data infrastructures. In: Cova, T.J., Miller, H.J., Beard, K., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2008. LNCS, vol. 5266, pp. 151–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Janowicz, K., Schade, S., Bröring, A., Keßler, C., Maue, P., Stasch, C.: Semantic enablement for spatial data infrastructures. Transactions in GIS 14(2), 111–129 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Duce, S., Janowicz, K. (2010). Microtheories for Spatial Data Infrastructures - Accounting for Diversity of Local Conceptualizations at a Global Level. In: Fabrikant, S.I., Reichenbacher, T., van Kreveld, M., Schlieder, C. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6292. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15300-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15300-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15299-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15300-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)