Skip to main content

A Logical Account of Lying

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6341))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper aims at providing a formal account of lying – a dishonest attitude of human beings. We first formulate lying under propositional modal logic and present basic properties for it. We then investigate why one engages in lying and how one reasons about lying. We distinguish between offensive and defensive lies, or deductive and abductive lies, based on intention behind the act. We also study two weak forms of dishonesty, bullshit and deception, and provide their logical features in contrast to lying. We finally argue dishonesty postulates that agents should try to satisfy for both moral and self-interested reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, J.E.: Lying, deceiving, or falsely implicating. J. Philosophy 94(9), 435–452 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Augustine, S.: Lying. In: Treatises on Various Subjects, Fathers of the Church, vol. 56, pp. 45–110 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonatti, P.A., Kraus, S., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Foundations of secure deductive databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 7(3), 406–422 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caminada, M.: Truth, lies and bullshit, distinguishing classes of dishonesty. In: Proc. IJCAI Workshop on Social Simulation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carson, T.L.: The definition of lying. Noûs 40(2), 284–306 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chisholm, R.M., Feehan, T.D.: The intent to deceive. Journal of Philosophy 74(3), 143–159 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Colombetti, M.: A modal logic of intentional communication. Mathematical Social Sciences 38, 171–196 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Demos, R.: Lying to oneself. Journal of Philosophy 57(18), 588–595 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fallis, D.: What is lying? Journal of Philosophy 106(1), 29–56 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frankfurt, H.G.: On Bullshit. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Halpern, J., Moses, J.: A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief. Artificial Intelligence 54, 349–379 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kupfer, J.: The moral presumption against lying. Review of Metaphysics 36, 103–126 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahon, J.E.: A definition of deceiving. J. Applied Philosophy 21(2), 181–194 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahon, J.E.: Two definitions of lying. J. Applied Philosophy 22(2), 211–230 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitri, S., Floreano, D., Keller, L.: The evolution of information suppression in communicating robots with conflicting interests. Proc. National Academy of Sciences 106(37), 15786–15790 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris, J.: Can computers ever lie? Philosophy Forum 14, 389–401 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Neill, B.: A formal system for understanding lies and deceit. In: Jerusalem Conference on Biblical Economics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Sklar, E., Parsons, S., Davies, M.: When is it okay to lie? A simple model of contradiction in agent-based dialogues. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366, pp. 251–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Staab, E., Caminada, M.: Assessing the impact of informedness on a consultant’s profit. In: Proc. 21st Benelux Conf. on AI (BNAIC 2009), Eindhoven, pp. 397–398 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Urchs, M.: Just lying. Logic and Logical Philosophy 15, 67–89 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sakama, C., Caminada, M., Herzig, A. (2010). A Logical Account of Lying. In: Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15675-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15675-5_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15674-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15675-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics