Skip to main content

Comparing Feature Extraction Techniques and Classifiers in the Handwritten Letters Classification Problem

  • Conference paper
Artificial Neural Networks – ICANN 2010 (ICANN 2010)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the performance of two feature extraction techniques, Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and also to compare two different kinds of classifiers, Neural Networks and Support Vector Machine (SVM). To this aim, a system for handwritten letters recognition was developed, which consist of two stages: a feature extraction stage using either ICA or PCA, and a classifier based on neural networks or SVM. To test the performance of the system, the subset of uppercase letters of the NIST#19 database was used. From the results of our tests, it can be concluded that when a neural network is used as classifier, the results are very similar with the two feature extraction techniques (ICA and PCA). But when the SVM classifier is used, the results are quite different, performing better the feature extractor based on ICA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hyväinen, A., Oja, E.: Independent components analysis:algorithms and applications. Neural Networks 13, 411–430 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis, 2nd edn. Series in Statistics. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Haykin, S.: Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Vapnik, V.N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd edn. Statistics for Engineering and Information Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Grother, P.J.: Nist special database 19: handprinted forms and characters database. Technical Report and CDROM (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. The r project for statistical computing, http://www.r-project.org/

  7. Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Amato, D.P. (ed.): Cross Validation Comparison of NIST OCR Databases. SPIE, Bellingham (April 1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

García-Manso, A., García-Orellana, C.J., González-Velasco, H.M., Macías-Macías, M., Gallardo-Caballero, R. (2010). Comparing Feature Extraction Techniques and Classifiers in the Handwritten Letters Classification Problem. In: Diamantaras, K., Duch, W., Iliadis, L.S. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks – ICANN 2010. ICANN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6354. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15825-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15825-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15824-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15825-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics