Skip to main content

Objective Space Partitioning Using Conflict Information for Many-Objective Optimization

  • Conference paper
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI (PPSN 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6238))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Here, we present a partition strategy to generate objective subspaces based on the analysis of the conflict information obtained from the Pareto front approximation found by an underlying multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. By grouping objectives in terms of the conflict among them, we aim to separate the multi-objective optimization into several subproblems in such a way that each of them contains the information to preserve as much as possible the structure of the original problem. The ranking and parent selection is independently performed in each subspace. Our experimental results show that the proposed conflict-based partition strategy outperforms NSGA-II in all the test problems considered in this study. In problems in which the degree of conflict among the objectives is significantly different, the conflict-based strategy achieves its best performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coello Coello, C.A., Lamont, G.B., Van Veldhuizen, D.A.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2007), ISBN 978-0-387-33254-3

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: A short review. In: CEC 2008, Hong Kong, pp. 2424–2431. IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farina, M., Amato, P.: On the Optimal Solution Definition for Many-criteria Optimization Problems. In: Proceedings of the NAFIPS-FLINT International Conference 2002, Piscataway, New Jersey, pp. 233–238. IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos (June 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sato, H., Aguirre, H.E., Tanaka, K.: Controlling Dominance Area of Solutions and Its Impact on the Performance of MOEAs. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 5–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Brockhoff, D., Zitzler, E.: Improving Hypervolume-based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms by Using Objective Reduction Methods. In: CEC 2007, Singapore, pp. 2086–2093. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (September 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. López Jaimes, A., Coello Coello, C.A., Urías Barrientos, J.E.: Online Objective Reduction to Deal with Many-Objective Problems. In: Ehrgott, M., Fonseca, C.M., Gandibleux, X., Hao, J.-K., Sevaux, M. (eds.) EMO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5467, pp. 423–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Deb, K., Saxena, D.K.: Searching for Pareto-optimal solutions through dimensionality reduction for certain large-dimensional multi-objective optimization problems. In: CEC 2006, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 3353–3360. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brockhoff, D., Zitzler, E.: Are All Objectives Necessary? On Dimensionality Reduction in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature IX, pp. 533–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. López Jaimes, A., Coello Coello, C.A., Chakraborty, D.: Objective Reduction Using a Feature Selection Technique. In: 2008 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2008), Atlanta, USA, pp. 674–680. ACM Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aguirre, H.E., Tanaka, K.: Many-Objective Optimization by Space Partitioning and Adaptive e-Ranking on MNK-Landscapes. In: Ehrgott, M., Fonseca, C.M., Gandibleux, X., Hao, J.-K., Sevaux, M. (eds.) EMO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5467, pp. 407–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., da Fonseca, V.G.: Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jaimes, A.L., Aguirre, H., Tanaka, K., Coello Coello, C.A. (2010). Objective Space Partitioning Using Conflict Information for Many-Objective Optimization. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI. PPSN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6238. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15844-5_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15844-5_66

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15843-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15844-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics