Skip to main content

New Uncertainty Handling Strategies in Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimization

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6239))

Abstract

Since many real-world optimization problems are noisy, vector optimization algorithms that can cope with noise and uncertainty are required. We propose new, robust selection strategies for evolutionary multi-objective optimization in the presence of noise. We apply new measures of uncertainty for estimating the recently introduced Pareto-dominance for uncertain and noisy environments (PDU). The first measure is the inter-quartile range of the outcomes of repeated function evaluations. The second is based on axis-aligned bounding boxes around the upper and lower quantiles of the sampled fitness values in objective space. Experiments on real and artificial problems show promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Trautmann, H., Mehnen, J.: Preference-Based Pareto-Optimization in Certain and Noisy Environments. Engineering Optimization 41, 23–38 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Trautmann, H., Mehnen, J., Naujoks, B.: Pareto-dominance in noisy environments. In: Tyrrell, A. (ed.) 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 3119–3126. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehnen, J., Trautmann, H.: Robust Multi-objective Optimisation of Weld Bead Geometry for Additive Manufacturing. In: Teti, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 6th CIRP International Seminar on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, CIRP ICME 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Berg, M., Cheong, O., van Kreveld, M., Overmars, M.: Computational Geometry, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Maron, O., Moore, A.W.: The racing algorithm: Model selection for lazy learners. Artificial Intelligence Review 11, 193–225 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Audibert, J.Y., Munos, R., Szepesvári, C.: Tuning bandit algorithms in stochastic environments. In: Hutter, M., Servedio, R.A., Takimoto, E. (eds.) ALT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4754, pp. 150–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Heidrich-Meisner, V., Igel, C.: Hoeffding and bernstein races for selecting policies in evolutionary direct policy search. In: Bottou, L., Littman, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2009), pp. 401–408 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Igel, C., Hansen, N., Roth, S.: Covariance matrix adaptation for multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation 15(1), 1–28 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Voß, T., Hansen, N., Igel, C.: Improved step size adaptation for the MO-CMA-ES. In: Proc. 12th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO). ACM Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Igel, C., Glasmachers, T., Heidrich-Meisner, V.: Shark. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 993–996 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Liratzis, T.: Tandem Gas Metal Arc Pipeline Welding. PhD thesis, Cranfield University, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wessing, S., Ding, J., Trautmann, H., Mehnen, J., Naujoks, B.: Sequential Parameter Optimization for Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization of Additive Layer Manufacturing. In: Teti, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th CIRP International Seminar on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, CIRP ICME 2010 (2010) (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L., While, L.: A review of multi-objective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 10, 477–506 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Büche, D., Stoll, P., Dornberger, R., Koumoutsakos, P.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for the optimization of noisy combustion processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 32, 460–473 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Voß, T., Trautmann, H., Igel, C. (2010). New Uncertainty Handling Strategies in Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimization. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI. PPSN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6239. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15870-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15871-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics