Skip to main content

From Benchmarks to Generalised Expectations

  • Chapter
Preferences and Decisions

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 257))

Abstract

A random variable can be equivalently regarded to as a function or as a “set”, namely, that of the points lying below (when positive) and above (when negative) its graph. The second approach, proposed by Segal in 1989, is known as the measure (or measurement) representation approach. On a technical ground, it allows for using Measure theory tools instead of Functional analysis ones, thus making often possible to reach new and deeper conclusions. On an interpretative ground, it makes clear how expectation and expected utility, either classical or à la Choquet, are structurally analogous and, moreover, it allows for dealing with new and more general types of expectations including, e.g., state dependence.

Starting from the measurement approach and from a decision-theoretical result by Castagnoli and LiCalzi (2006), we present a new representation theorem in the same perspective and, finally, we propose a definition of generalised expectations and two different concepts of associativity that can be imposed to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amarante, M.: Foundations of neo-bayesian statistics. J. Econ. Theory 144, 2146–2173 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beccacece, F., Cillo, A.: Applying the benchmarking procedure: a decision criterion of choice under risk. Theory Dec. 61, 75–91 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bordley, R.F.: Foundations of Target-based Decision Theory. In: Brachinger, H.W., Monney, P. (eds.) Decision Analysis, from Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Eolss Publishers, Oxford (2002), http://www.eolss.net

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordley, R.F., LiCalzi, M.: Decision Analysis Using Targets instead of Utility Functions. Decis. Econ. Finance 23, 53–74 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli, E.: Qualche riflessione sull’utilità attesa. Ratio Math. 1, 51–59 (1990)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli, E., LiCalzi, M.: Expected Utility without Utility: Constant Risk Attitude. Rend. com. studi econ. XXX/XXXI, 145–160 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli, E., LiCalzi, M.: Expected Utility without Utility: A Model of Portfolio Selection. In: D’Ecclesia, R.L., Zenios, S.A. (eds.) Operations Research Models in Quantitative Finance, pp. 95–111. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli, E., LiCalzi, M.: Expected Utility without Utility. Theory Dec. 41, 281–301 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli, E., LiCalzi, M.: Benchmarking real-valued acts. Games Econ. Behav. 57, 236–253 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli, E., Favero, G., Maccheroni, F.: Marchetto, il prezzatore perfetto (Elogio dell’internalità). Edizioni Čakuntala, Milano (still in progress) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigola, M., Modesti, P.: On SSB Utility Theory. In: Bertocchi, M., Cavalli, E., Komlosi, S. (eds.) Modelling Techniques for Financial Markets and Bank Management, pp. 272–284. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In: Arrow, K.J., Karlin, S., Suppes, P. (eds.) Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959: Proceedings of the First Stanford Symposium. Stanford Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 16–26. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1960) (reprinted as Cowles Foundation paper 156)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, G.H.: Integrale monotono. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 57, 149–166 (1977)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: A Universal Integral as Common Frame for Choquet and Sugeno integrals. Work in progress (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Modesti, P.: Lottery-dependent Utility via Stochastic Benchmarking. Theory Dec. 55, 45–57 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nehring, K.: Capacities and probabilistic beliefs: a precarious coexistence. Math. Soc. Sci. 38, 197–213 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1951) (revised edition, Dover, New York (1972))

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U.: Anticipated Utility: A Measure Representation Approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 19, 359–373 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U.: The Measure Representation: A Correction. J. Risk Uncertainty 6, 99–107 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quart. J. Econ. 69, 99–118 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Castagnoli, E., Favero, G. (2010). From Benchmarks to Generalised Expectations. In: Greco, S., Marques Pereira, R.A., Squillante, M., Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Preferences and Decisions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 257. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15976-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15976-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15975-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15976-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics