Abstract
Delay effect appears as an anomaly of the traditional discounted utility model according to which a decrease of the discount rate is performed as waiting time increases. But, in this description, it is not clear if the benchmark (that is to say, the reference instant in the assessment process) or the discounted amount availability is fixed or variable. In this way, other authors use the term common difference effect (and immediacy effect, when the first outcome is available immediately) and this expression at least does implies a variable discounted amount availability. Read introduces another different effect, the interval effect: longer intervals lead to smaller values of the discount rate r. Taking into account the parameter δ (geometric mean of the discount factor), the interval effect implies larger values of δ. In this paper we try to clarify the concepts of delay and interval effect and we deduce some relationships between these concepts and certain subadditive discounting functions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ainslie, G.: Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., Yagil, J.: Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Science 35(3), 270–284 (1989)
Chapman, G.: Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22(3), 771–791 (1996)
Coller, M., Williams, M.: Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics 2, 107–127 (1999)
Cruz, S., Muñoz, M.J.: An analysis of the anomalies in traditional discount-ing models. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 4(1), 105–128 (2004)
Cruz, S., Ventre, A.: Decomposable financial laws and profitability. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems 6(4), 329–344 (1998)
Harrison, G., Lau, M.: Is the Evidence for Hyperbolic Discounting in Humans Just An Experimental Artefact? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(5), 657 (2005)
Mazur, J.: Tests of an equivalence rule for fixed and variable reinforcer delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 10, 426–436 (1984)
Mazur, J.: An adjustement procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: Commons, M., Mazur, J., Nevins, J., Rachlin, H. (eds.) Quantitative analyses of behavior: The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value, ch. 2, Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)
Prelec, D., Loewenstein, G.: Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science 37, 770–786 (1991)
Rachlin, H.: Judgement, decision and choice: A cognitive/behavioral synthesis. Freeman, New York (1989)
Read, D.: Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23(1), 5–32 (2001)
Read, D.: Subadditive intertemporal choice. In: Loewenstein, G., Read, D., Baumeister, R. (eds.) Time and decision: economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2003)
Read, D.: Intertemporal choice. In: Koehler, D., Harvey, N. (eds.) Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)
Sholten, M., Read, D.: Discounting by intervals: A generalized model of in-tertemporal choice. Management Science 52(9), 1424–1436 (2006)
Soman, D., Ainslie, G., Frederick, S., Li, X., Lynch, J., Moreau, P., Mitchell, A., Read, D., Sawyer, A., Trope, Y., Wertenbroch, K., Zauberman, G.: The psychology of intertemporal discounting: Why are distant events valued differently from proximal ones? Marketing Letters 16(3/4), 347–360 (2005)
Thaler, R.: Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economic Letters 8, 201–207 (1981)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rambaud, S.C., Torrecillas, M.J.M. (2010). Delay and Interval Effects with Subadditive Discounting Functions. In: Greco, S., Marques Pereira, R.A., Squillante, M., Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Preferences and Decisions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 257. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15976-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15976-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15975-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15976-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)