Skip to main content

Clausal Graph Tableaux for Hybrid Logic with Eventualities and Difference

  • Conference paper
Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6397))

Abstract

We introduce the method of clausal graph tableaux at the example of hybrid logic with difference and star modalities. Clausal graph tableaux are prefix-free and terminate by construction. They provide an abstract method of establishing the small model property of modal logics. In contrast to the filtration method, clausal graph tableaux result in goal-directed decision procedures. Until now no goal-directed decision procedure for the logic considered in this paper was known. There is the promise that clausal graph tableaux lead to a new class of effective decision procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Areces, C., Blackburn, P., Marx, M.: The computational complexity of hybrid temporal logics. L. J. IGPL 8(5), 653–679 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Areces, C., ten Cate, B.: Hybrid logics. In: Blackburn, et al. (eds.) [4], pp. 821–868

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn, P.: Internalizing labelled deduction. J. Log. Comput. 10(1), 137–168 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., Wolter, F. (eds.): Handbook of Modal Logic, Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, vol. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson, E.A., Clarke, E.M.: Using branching time temporal logic to synthesize synchronization skeletons. Sci. Comput. Programming 2(3), 241–266 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: “Sometimes” and “not never” revisited: On branching versus linear time temporal logic. J. ACM 33(1), 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer, M.J., Ladner, R.E.: Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. J. Comput. System Sci. 194–211 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fitting, M.: Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1983)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabbay, D.M.: Selective filtration in modal logic, Part A. Semantic tableaux method. Theoria 36(3), 323–330 (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Giesl, J., Hähnle, R. (eds.): IJCAR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6173. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Goré, R., Nguyen, L.A.: EXPTIME tableaux with global caching for description logics with transitive roles, inverse roles and role hierarchies. In: Olivetti, N. (ed.) TABLEAUX 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4548, pp. 133–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Goré, R., Nguyen, L.A.: Clausal tableaux for multimodal logics of belief. Fund. Inform. 94(1), 21–40 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Goré, R., Widmann, F.: Optimal tableaux for propositional dynamic logic with converse. In: Giesl, Hähnle (eds.) [11], pp. 225–239

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harel, D., Kozen, D., Tiuryn, J.: Dynamic Logic. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Horrocks, I., Hustadt, U., Sattler, U., Schmidt, R.: Computational modal logic. In: Blackburn, et al. (eds.) [4], pp. 181–245

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaminski, M., Smolka, G.: Clausal graph tableaux for hybrid logic with eventualities and difference. Technical report, Saarland University (2010), http://www.ps.uni-saarland.de/Publications/details/KaminskiSmolka:2010:ClausalGraph.html

  18. Kaminski, M., Smolka, G.: Clausal tableaux for hybrid PDL. Technical report, Saarland University (2010), http://www.ps.uni-saarland.de/Publications/details/KaminskiSmolka:2010:HPDL.html

  19. Kaminski, M., Smolka, G.: Terminating tableaux for hybrid logic with eventualities. In: Giesl, Hähnle (eds.) [11], pp. 240–254

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kesten, Y., Manna, Z., McGuire, H., Pnueli, A.: A decision algorithm for full propositional temporal logic. In: Courcoubetis, C. (ed.) CAV 1993. LNCS, vol. 697, pp. 97–109. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Kripke, S.A.: Semantical analysis of modal logic I: Normal modal propositional calculi. Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. 9, 67–96 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lemmon, E.J., Scott, D.: The ‘Lemmon Notes’: An Introduction to Modal Logic. Blackwell, Malden (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Manna, Z., Wolper, P.: Synthesis of communicating processes from temporal logic specifications. ACM TOPLAS 6(1), 68–93 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Massacci, F.: Single step tableaux for modal logics. J. Autom. Reasoning 24(3), 319–364 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen, L.A.: A new space bound for the modal logics K4, KD4 and S4. In: Kutyłowski, M., Wierzbicki, T., Pacholski, L. (eds.) MFCS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1672, pp. 321–331. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: Proc. 18th Annual Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 1977), pp. 46–57. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pratt, V.R.: A near-optimal method for reasoning about action. J. Comput. System Sci. 20(2), 231–254 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Sattler, U., Vardi, M.Y.: The hybrid μ-calculus. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2083, pp. 76–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Segerberg, K.: An Essay in Classical Modal Logic. No. 13 in Filosofiska Studier. University of Uppsala (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tanabe, Y., Takahashi, K., Hagiya, M.: A decision procedure for alternation-free modal μ-calculi. In: Areces, C., Goldblatt, R. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 7, pp. 341–362. College Publications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Optimizing terminological reasoning for expressive description logics. J. Autom. Reasoning 39(3), 277–316 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaminski, M., Smolka, G. (2010). Clausal Graph Tableaux for Hybrid Logic with Eventualities and Difference. In: Fermüller, C.G., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6397. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16241-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16242-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics