Skip to main content

A New Hybrid Method of Generation of Decision Rules Using the Constructive Induction Mechanism

  • Conference paper
Book cover Rough Set and Knowledge Technology (RSKT 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6401))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our research is devoted to develop a new method of generation of a set of decision rules. This method is compiled using two different mechanisms. The first one is based on applying a new constructive induction algorithm to the investigated dataset. The belief networks are used in this algorithm. The aim is to find the most important descriptive attribute that is calculated on the basis of other attributes. The second part of the presented method constitutes the improvement algorithm that is used in an optimization process of a gathered rule set. The results of our research contain the comparison of classification efficiency using several datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P.: From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Magazine 17, 37–54 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Piramuthu, S., Sikora, R.: Iterative feature construction for improving inductive learning algorithms. Expert Systems with Application 36, 3401–3406 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, H., Sun, J., Zhang, H.: Post-processing of associative classification rules using closed sets. Expert Systems with Application 36, 6659–6667 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spreeuwenberg, S., Gerrits, R.: Requirements for successful verification in practice. In: Haller, S., Simmons, G. (eds.) Proc. of the 15th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Pensacola Beach, Florida, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen, F.: Logical Foundations for Rule-Based Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lo, D., Khoo, S., Wong, L.: Non-redundant sequential rules – theory and algorithm. Information Systems 34(4-5), 438–453 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzales, A., Barr, V.: Validation and verification of intelligent systems. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12(2), 407–420 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wnek, J., Michalski, R.: Hypothesis-driven constructive induction in AQ17-HCI: A method and experiments. Machine Learning 14(2), 139–168 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, R., Rigel, D., Kopf, A.: Early detection of malignant melanoma: the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 35, 130–151 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hippe, Z., Bajcar, S., Blajdo, P., Grzymala-Busse, J., Grzymala-Busse, J., Knap, M., Paja, W., Wrzesien, M.: Diagnosing skin melanoma: Current versus future directions. TASK Quarterly 7(2), 289–293 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duch, W., Kucharski, T., Gomuła, J., Adamczak, R.: Machine learning methods in analysis of psychometric data. Application to Multiphasic Personality Inventory MMPI-WISKAD, Toruń (1999) (in polish)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hippe, Z.: Machine learning – a promising strategy for business information systems? In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) Business Information Systems 1997, pp. 603–622. Academy of Economics, Poznan (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen, F.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Błajdo, P., Grzymała-Busse, J., Hippe, Z., Knap, M., Marek, T., Mroczek, T., Wrzesień, M.: A suite of machine learning programs for data mining: chemical applications. In: Debska, B., Fic, G. (eds.) Information Systems in Chemistry, vol. 2, pp. 7–14. University of Technology Editorial Office, Rzeszow (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paja, W.: RuleSEEKER – a new system to manage knowledge in form of decision rules. In: Tadeusiewicz, R., Ligeza, A., Szymkat, M. (eds.) Computer Methods and Systems. Ed. Office ONT, Cracow, pp. 367–370 (1997) (in polish)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paja, W., Pancerz, K., Wrzesień, M. (2010). A New Hybrid Method of Generation of Decision Rules Using the Constructive Induction Mechanism. In: Yu, J., Greco, S., Lingras, P., Wang, G., Skowron, A. (eds) Rough Set and Knowledge Technology. RSKT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6401. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16248-0_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16248-0_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16247-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16248-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics