Skip to main content

Towards a Reusable Unified Basis for Representing Business Domain Knowledge and Development Artifacts in Systems Engineering

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6413))

Abstract

During the systems engineering process many heterogeneous artifacts which belong to different engineering disciplines and describe different views upon the product to be developed are produced. In order to integrate these artifacts, to increase the level of reuse, or to evaluate and implement changes, we need semantically rich relations between development artifacts and the parts of the product they describe. In this paper, we present our research to extend the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology with a mid-level layer which can be used as a reusable semantic basis for making the knowledge about the developed product, the development artifacts, and the relations between them explicit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. O’Brien, W.: Avoiding semantic and temporal gaps in developing software intensive systems. Journal of Systems and Software 81(11), 1997–2013 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Niles, I., Pease, A.: Origins of the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the deep structure of information systems. Informations Systems Journal 5, 203–223 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Degen, W., Heller, B., Herre, H., Smith, B.: GOL: toward an axiomatized upper-level ontology. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, FOIS 2001, pp. 34–46. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Devanbu, P., Brachman, R., Selfridge, P., Ballard, B.: LaSSIE: A knowledge-based software information system. Comm. of the ACM 34(5), 34–49 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Billig, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Enterprise ontology based artefact management. Lecture Notes in Informatics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sandkuhl, K., Billig, A.: Ontology-based artefact management in automotive electronics. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 20(7), 627–638 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J., Suh, H.: Ontology-based multi-level knowledge framework for a knowledge management system for discrete-product development. International Journal of CAD/CAM 5(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, X., Rai, R., Terpenny, J.: Development and utilization of ontologies in design for manufacturing. Journal of Mechanical Design 132(2) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maga, C., Jazdi, N.: Concept of a domain repository for industrial automation. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Domain Engineering (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conrad, J., Deubel, T., Koehler, C., Wanke, S., Weber, C.: Comparison of knowledge representation in PDM and by semantic networks. In: Design for society / International Conference on Engineering Design (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Witte, R., Li, Q., Zhang, Y., Rilling, J.: Ontological text mining of software documents. In: Kedad, Z., Lammari, N., Métais, E., Meziane, F., Rezgui, Y. (eds.) NLDB 2007. LNCS, vol. 4592, pp. 168–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Witte, R., Zhang, Y., Rilling, J.: Empowering software maintainers with semantic web technologies. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 37–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Y., Witte, R., Rilling, J., Haarslev, V.: An ontology-based approach for traceability recovery. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Metamodels, Schemas, Grammars, and Ontologies for Reverse Engineering, ATEM 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Braga, R.M.M., Werner, C.M.L., Mattoso, M.: Using ontologies for domain information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA 2000, p. 836. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Z., Raskin, V., Ramani, K.: Developing engineering ontology for information retrieval. ASME Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 8(1), 21–33 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Z., Yang, M.C., Ramani, K.: A methodology for engineering ontology acquisition and validation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23(1), 37–51 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kofler, T., Ratiu, D. (2010). Towards a Reusable Unified Basis for Representing Business Domain Knowledge and Development Artifacts in Systems Engineering. In: Trujillo, J., et al. Advances in Conceptual Modeling – Applications and Challenges. ER 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16385-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16385-2_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16384-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16385-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics