Skip to main content

Abstract

An ontology consists of a finite set of entities and relationships among these entities. Relationships in an OWL ontology are given by the object properties, defined as a binary relation between classes in the domain with classes in the range. These relationships define semantic coupling among classes. This paper formally define some metrics to measure semantic coupling among classes in OWL ontologies. Moreover it also describes a visualisation to analyse the proposed metrics using visual analytics techniques. We have implemented a tool to test our metrics with real public ontologies and the results are analysed and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chidamber, S., Kemerer, C.: A Metrics suite for object Oriented Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(6), 476–493 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison, R., Counsell, S., Nithi, R.: Coupling Metrics for Object-Oriented Design. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Software Metrics. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vrandecic, D., Sure, Y.: How to Design Better Ontology Metrics. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 311–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Alani, H., Brewster, C., Shadbolt, N.: Ranking Ontologies with AKTiveRank. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Alani, H., Brewster, C.: Metrics for Ranking Ontologies. In: 4th Int. EON Workshop, 15th Int. World Wide Web Conference (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orme, A., Yao, H., Etzkorn, L.: Coupling Metrics for Ontology-Based Systems. IEEE Software, 102–108 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yao, H., Orme, A., Etzkorn, L.: Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application. Journal of Computer Science 1(1), 107–113 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Ma, B. Jin, Y. Feng, Semantic oriented ontology cohesion metrics for ontology-based systems. The Journal of Systems and Software (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: An Overview of OntoClean. In: The Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 151–172. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM, 61–65 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Ye, C.: Evaluation Metrics for Ontology Complexity and Evolution Analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tartir, S., Arpinar, B., Moore, M., Sheth, A., Aleman-meza, B.: OntoQA: Metric-based ontology quality analysis. In: CiteSeerX - Scientific Literature Digital Library and Search Engine (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tartir, S., Arpinar, B.: Ontology Evaluation and Ranking using OntoQA. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lozano-Tello, A., Gomez-Perez, A.: ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropiate Ontology. Journal of Database Management (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: A Semantic Web Primer, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aleman-meza, B., Halaschek, C., Sheth, A., Arpinar, B., Sannapareddy, G.: SWETO: Large-Scale Semantic Web Testbed. In: 16th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carlton, B., Farmer, G., Scrudder, R.: A C2IEDM Based Approach to C4I and Simulation Initialization and Synchronization. In: The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, I/ITSEC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shneiderman, B.: Tree visualization with treemaps: a 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Transactions on Graphics 11(1), 92–99 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao, R., Card, S.: The Table Lens: Merging Graphical and Symbolic Representations in an Interactive Focus+Context Visualization for Tabular Information. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garcia, J., Garcia, F., Theron, R. (2010). Visualising Semantic Coupling among Entities in an OWL Ontology. In: Sicilia, MA., Kop, C., Sartori, F. (eds) Ontology, Conceptualization and Epistemology for Information Systems, Software Engineering and Service Science. ONTOSE 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 62. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16496-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16496-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16495-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16496-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics