Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6237))

Abstract

One of the main emerging challenges in legal documentation is to capture the meaning and the semantics of normative content using NLP techniques, and to isolate the relevant part of the linguistic speech. The last five years have seen an explosion in XML schemas and DTDs whose focus in modelling legal resources their focus was on structure. Now that the basic elements of textual descriptiveness are well formalized, we can use this knowledge to proceed with content. This paper presents a detailed methodology for classifying modificatory provisions in depth and providing all the necessary information for semi-automatically managing the consolidation process. The methodology is based on an empirical legal analysis of about 29,000 Italian acts, where we bring out regularities in the language associated with some modifications, and where we define patterns of proprieties for each type of modificatory provision. The list of verbs and the frames inferred through this empirical legal analysis have been used by the NLP group at the University of Turin to refine a syntactical NLP parser for isolating and representing the sentences as syntactic trees, and the pattern will be used by the light semantic interpreter module to indentify the parameters of modificatory provisions.

This paper was carried out with the following authors’ contributions: M. Palmirani paragraphs 1, 2, 6, 7, appendix; R. Brighi paragraphs 3, 4, 5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold-Moore, T.: Automatic Generation of Amendment Legislation. In: Procs. of ICAIL 1997, pp. 56–62 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biagioli, C., Francesconi, E., Spinosa, P., Taddei, M.: The NIR project. Standards and tools for legislative drafting and legal document Web publication. In: Proc. ICAIL 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biagioli, C., Grossi, D.: Formal Aspects of Legislative Meta-Drafting. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2008, pp. 192–201. ISO Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breuker, J., Boer, A., Hoekstra, R., Van Den Berg, C.: Developing Content for LKIF: Ontologies and Framework for Legal Reasoning. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2006, pp. 41–50. ISO Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Circolare AIPA/CR/35, Assegnazione dei nomi uniformi ai documenti giuridici, GU n. 262 del 10/11/2001

    Google Scholar 

  6. Circolare AIPA/CR/40, Formato per la rappresentazione elettronica dei provvedimenti normativi tramite il linguaggio di marcatura XML, GU n. 102 del 3/5/2002

    Google Scholar 

  7. Consolidation Interim report of the working group, European Forum of Official Gazettes, 5th meeting, Madrid (September 25-26, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Maat, E., Winkles: Automatic Classification of Sentences in Dutch Laws. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2008, pp. 207–216. ISO Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Maat, E., Winkles, R., Van Engers, T.: Automated Detection of Reference Structures in Law. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2006, pp. 41–50. ISO Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Francesconi, E., Passerini, A.: Automatic classification of provisions in legislative texts. In: ICAIL 2007, vol. 15, pp. 1–17 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guastini, R.: Teoria e dogmatica delle fonti. Giuffrè, Milan (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gullickson, K.: Drafting Legislation Using XML in the U.S. House of Representatives. In: World e-Parliament Conference 2008, Bruxelles, November 25-26 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McClure, J.: Legal-RDF Vocabularies, Requirements & Design Rationale. In: Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, pp. 149–160. European Press Academic Publishing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lupo, C., Vitali, F., Francesconi, E., Palmirani, M., Winkels, R., de Maat, E., Boer, A., Mascellani, P.: General xml format(s) for legal sources - Estrella European Project IST-2004-027655. Deliverable 3.1, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mazzei, A., Radicioni, D.P., Brighi, R.: NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics. In: ICAIL 2009, pp. 50–57. ACM Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pagano, R.: Introduzione alla legistica, 2nd edn. Giuffrè, Milan (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palmirani, M., Brighi, R.: An XML Editor for Legal Information Management. In: Proceeding of the DEXA 2003, Workshop su E-Government, Praga, Settembre 1-5, pp. 421–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Palmirani, M., Brighi, R., Massini, M.: Automated Extraction of Normaive Reference in Legal Texts. In: Proc. ICAIL 2003, pp. 105–106. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palmirani, M.: Time Model in Normative Information Systems. In: The Proceeding of workshop "The Role of the Legal Knowledge in the eGovernment", ICAIL 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Palmirani, M., Contissa, G., Rubino, R.: Fill the Gap in the Legal Knowledge Modelling. In: Governatori, G., Hall, J., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2009. LNCS, vol. 5858, pp. 305–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Saias, J., Quaresma, P.: A Methodology to Create Legal Ontologies, in a Logic Programming Based Web Information Retrieval System. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12(4), 397–417 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sartor, G.: Riferimenti normativi e dinamica dei nessi normativi. In: Il procedimento normativo regionale, Cedam, Padova (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Soria, C., Bartolini, R., Lenci, A., Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V.: Automatic Extraction of Semantics in Law Documents. In: Biagioli, C., Francesconi, E., Sartor, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, pp. 253–266. European Press Academic Publishing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rescigno, G.U.: L’atto normativo. Zanichelli, Bologna (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rubino, R., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: An OWL ontology of fundamental legal concepts. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2006, pp. 101–110. ISO Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zagrebelsky, Il sistema costituzionale delle fonti del diritto Turin: EGES (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Palmirani, M., Brighi, R. (2010). Model Regularity of Legal Language in Active Modifications. In: Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Sartor, G., Ajani, G. (eds) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Complex Systems, the Semantic Web, Ontologies, Argumentation, and Dialogue. AICOL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6237. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16523-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16524-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics