Skip to main content

ESAT: A Tool for Animating Logic-Based Specifications of Evolvable Component Systems

  • Conference paper
Runtime Verification (RV 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6418))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1525 Accesses

Introduction

An increasingly important area of runtime monitoring is the incorporation of techniques for diagnosis and repair, for example, in autonomic control applications [9], in robotics, and in e-business process change [12]. In particular, a runtime monitor becomes a ’supervisor’ - a process which not only monitors but may evolve the running system dynamically. In [4], a framework for the logical modelling of hierarchically structured supervised component systems was set out. The modelling captures the following key behavioural concepts: at runtime, a supervisory component can (i) monitor its supervisee to ensure conformance against desired behaviour, (ii) analyse reasons for non-conformance, should that arise, (iii) evolve its supervisee in a pre-programmed way following diagnosis, or via external stimulus received from higher-level supervisory components. Structurally, components may contain sub-components, actions over the state of the component, and programs over the actions. In this logical framework, components are specified by first-order logic theories. Actions are either basic revisions to the state of the component or combinations of actions. Crucially, a supervisory component is treated as a logical theory meta to its supervisee, thus providing access to all facets of the supervisee’s structure. A supervisory component program is executed meta to its supervisee’s program. Synchronisation between the two may occur through a variety of schemes, from lock-step synchronisation to asynchronous execution with defined synchronisation points. A supervisory program action may evolve its supervisee by making changes to its state, to its actions, to its sub-components, or to its program. This occurs in the logical framework via a theory change induced from the meta-level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afifi, D., Rydeheard, D., Barringer, H.: Automated reasoning in the simulation of evolvable systems. In: Workshop on Practical Aspects of Automated Reasoning (PAAR 2010), Edinburgh, UK (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akbarpour, B., Paulson, L.C.: Towards automatic proofs of inequalities involving elementary functions. PDPAR 2006: Pragmatical Aspects of Decision Procedures in Automated Reasoning, p. 27 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett, C., Tinelli, C.: CVC3. In: Damm, W., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CAV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4590, pp. 298–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Barringer, H., Gabbay, D., Rydeheard, D.: Modelling evolvable component systems: Part I: A logical framework. Logic Jnl IGPL 17(6), 631–696 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Claessen, K., Sörensson, N.: New techniques that improve MACE-style model finding. In: Proc. of Workshop on Model Computation, MODEL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crocker, D.: Perfect developer: A tool for object-oriented formal specification and refinement. tools exhibition notes at formal methods europe. In. Tools Exhibition Notes at Formal Methods Europe, p. 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Moura, L., Bjørner, N.: Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 337–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Enderton, H.B., NetLibrary, I.: A mathematical introduction to logic. Academic Press, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36(1), 41–50 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Korovin, K.: iProver - an instantiation-based theorem prover for first-order logic (system description). In: Armando, A., Baumgartner, P., Dowek, G. (eds.) IJCAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5195, pp. 292–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lincoln, P., Clavel, M., Eker, S., Meseguer, J.: Principles of maude. In: Meseguer, J. (ed.) Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 4, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oquendo, F., Warboys, B., Morrison, R., Dindeleux, R., Gallo, F., Garavel, H., Occhipinti, C.: ArchWare: Architecting Evolvable Software. In: Oquendo, F., Warboys, B.C., Morrison, R. (eds.) EWSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3047, pp. 257–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Prevosto, V., Waldmann, U.: Spass+ t. ESCoR: Empirically Successful Computerized Reasoning 192, 88 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riazanov, A., Voronkov, A.: The design and implementation of VAMPIRE. AI Communications 15(2-3), 91–110 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Schulz, S.: E-a brainiac theorem prover. AI Communications 15(2), 111–126 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, C.B.: The TPTP Problem Library: CNF Release v1.2.1. Journal of Automated Reasoning 21(2), 177–203 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Afifi, D., Rydeheard, D.E., Barringer, H. (2010). ESAT: A Tool for Animating Logic-Based Specifications of Evolvable Component Systems. In: Barringer, H., et al. Runtime Verification. RV 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6418. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16612-9_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16612-9_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16611-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16612-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics