Skip to main content

Empirical Evaluation of Ranking Prediction Methods for Gene Expression Data Classification

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Artificial Intelligence – IBERAMIA 2010 (IBERAMIA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6433))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, meta-learning techniques have been employed to the problem of algorithm recommendation for gene expression data classification. Due to their flexibility, the advice provided to the user was in the form of rankings, which are able to express a preference order of Machine Learning algorithms accordingly to their expected relative performance. Thus, choosing how to learn accurate rankings arises as a key research issue. In this work, the authors empirically evaluated 2 general approaches for ranking prediction and extended them. The results obtained for 49 publicly available microarray datasets indicate that the extensions introduced were very beneficial to the quality of the predicted rankings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Russell, S., Meadows, L., Russell, R.: Microarray Technology in Practice, 1st edn. Academic Press, San Diego (October 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brazdil, P., Giraud-Carrier, C., Soares, C., Vilalta, R.: Metalearning: Applications to Data Mining. In: Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Souza, B.F., Soares, C., de Carvalho, A.: Meta-learning approach to gene expression data classification. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics 2(2), 285–303 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Todorovski, L., Blockeel, H., Dzeroski, S.: Ranking with predictive clustering trees. In: Elomaa, T., Mannila, H., Toivonen, H. (eds.) ECML 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2430, pp. 444–455. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Rebelo, C., Soares, C., Costa, J.P.: Empirical evaluation of ranking trees on some metalearning problems. In: Chomicki, J., Conitzer, V., Junker, U., Perny, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the MPREF 2008, Held in Conjunction with the AAAI 2008, Chicago, Illinois (July 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hechenbichler, K., Schliep, K.: Weighted k-nearest-neighbor techniques and ordinal classification (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2), 123–140 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Souza, B.F., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F., Soares, C. (2010). Empirical Evaluation of Ranking Prediction Methods for Gene Expression Data Classification. In: Kuri-Morales, A., Simari, G.R. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence – IBERAMIA 2010. IBERAMIA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6433. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16952-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16952-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16951-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16952-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics