Skip to main content

Integration Proposal for Description Logic and Attributive Logic – Towards Semantic Web Rules

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 6450))

Abstract

The current challenge of the Semantic Web is the development of an expressive yet effective rule language. This paper presents an integration proposal for Description Logics (DL) and Attributive Logics (ALSV) is presented. These two formalisms stem from fields of Knowledge Representation and Artificial Intelligence. However, they are based on different design goals and therefore provide different description and reasoning capabilities. ALSV is the foundation of XTT2, an expressive language for rule-based systems. DL provide formulation for expressive ontology languages such as OWL2. An important research direction is the development of rule languages that can be integrated with ontologies. The contribution of the paper consists in introducing a possible transition from ALSV to DL. This opens up possibilities of using XTT2, a well-founded rule-based system modelling rule language, to improve the design of Semantic Web rules.

The paper is supported by the BIMLOQ Project funded from 2010–2012 resources for science as a research project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nalepa, G.J., Furmańska, W.T.: Proposal of a New Rule-based Inference Scheme for the Semantic Web Applications. In: New Challenges in Computational Collective Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 15–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web: Scientific american. Scientific American (May 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kifer, M., Boley, H.: RIF overview. W3C working draft, W3C (October 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-overview

  5. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, w3c member submission 21 may 2004. Technical report, W3C (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B. (eds.): Handbook of Knowledge Representation. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Liebowitz, J. (ed.): The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Giarratano, J., Riley, G.: Expert Systems. Principles and Programming, 4th edn. Thomson Course Technology, Boston (2005) ISBN 0-534-38447-1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ligęza, A.: Logical Foundations for Rule-Based Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bratko, I.: Prolog Programming for Artificial Intelligence, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Nalepa, G.J., Ligęza, A.: XTT+ rule design using the ALSV(FD). In: Giurca, A., Analyti, A., Wagner, G. (eds.) 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence: 2nd East European Workshop on Rule-based applications RuleApps 2008 Patras, ECAI 2008, pp. 11–15. University of Patras, Patras (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nalepa, G.J., Ligęza, A.: HeKatE methodology, hybrid engineering of intelligent systems. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (2010) (accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Rudolph, S.: OWL 2 web ontology language — primer. W3C recommendation, W3C (October 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nalepa, G.J., Ligęza, A.: On ALSV rules formulation and inference. In: Lane, H.C., Guesgen, H.W. (eds.) Proceedings of the twenty-second International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-22, May 19–21, pp. 396–401. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klösgen, W., Żytkow, J.M. (eds.): Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Oxford University Press, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ligęza, A., Nalepa, G.J.: Rules verification and validation. In: Giurca, A., Dragan Gasevic, K.T. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-Based Languages and Technologies: Open Solutions and Approaches, pp. 273–301. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Ligęza, A.: Logical Foundations for Rule-Based Systems. Uczelniane Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Dydaktyczne AGH w Krakowie, Kraków (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Bridging the gap between OWL and relational databases. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 7(2), 74–89 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Negnevitsky, M.: Artificial Intelligence. A Guide to Intelligent Systems. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (2002) ISBN 0-201-71159-1

    Google Scholar 

  21. Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: A Semantic Web Primer. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ullman, J.D.: Principles of Database and Knowledge-Base Systems, vol. I. Computer Science Press, Rockville (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kifer, M., Lausen, G., Wu, J.: Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. J. ACM 42(4), 741–843 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: AL-log: integrating datalog and description logics. J. of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 10, 227–252 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Levy, A.Y., Rousset, M.C.: Combining horn rules and description logics in CARIN. Artif. Intell. 104(1-2), 165–209 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Polleres, A., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Reasoning with rules and ontologies. In: Barahona, P., Bry, F., Franconi, E., Henze, N., Sattler, U. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2006. LNCS, vol. 4126, pp. 93–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. Artificial Intelligence 172, 12–13 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Rosati, R., Sattler, U.: Can OWL and logic programming live together happily ever after? In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2003, pp. 48–57 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horrocks, I., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P., Hendler, J.: Semantic web architecture: Stack or two towers? In: Fages, F., Soliman, S. (eds.) PPSWR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3703, pp. 37–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. McGuinness, D.L., Welty, C., Smith, M.K.: OWL web ontology language guide. W3C recommendation, W3C (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210

  32. Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query answering for owl-dl with rules. Journal of Web Semantics, 549–563 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., Hitzler, P.: ELP: Tractable rules for OWL 2. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 649–664. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Szostek-Janik, J.: Translations of knowledge representations for rule-based systems. AGH University of Science and Technology, MSc Thesis (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baader, F., Lutz, C., Miličic, M., Sattler, U., Wolter, F.: Integrating description logics and action formalisms: first results. In: Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial intelligence, AAAI 2005, pp. 572–577. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bong, Y.: Description logic ABox updates revisited. Master thesis, TU Dresden, Germany (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Drescher, C., Liu, H., Baader, F., Guhlemann, S., Petersohn, U., Steinke, P., Thielscher, M.: Putting abox updates into action. In: Ghilardi, S., Sebastiani, R. (eds.) FroCoS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5749, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Baader, F., Bauer, A., Baumgartner, P., Cregan, A., Gabaldon, A., Ji, K., Lee, K., Rajaratnam, D., Schwitter, R.: A novel architecture for situation awareness systems. In: Giese, M., Waaler, A. (eds.) TABLEAUX 2009. LNCS, vol. 5607, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S.: Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Matzner, T., Hitzler, P.: Any-world access to OWL from Prolog. In: Hertzberg, J., Beetz, M., Englert, R. (eds.) KI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4667, pp. 84–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nalepa, G.J., Furmańska, W.T. (2010). Integration Proposal for Description Logic and Attributive Logic – Towards Semantic Web Rules. In: Nguyen, N.T., Kowalczyk, R. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6450. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17155-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17155-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17154-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17155-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics