Skip to main content

A Logic for Reasoning about Actions and Explicit Observations

  • Conference paper
Book cover AI 2010: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6464))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose a formalism for reasoning about actions based on multi-modal logic which allows for expressing observations as first-class objects. We introduce a new modal operator, namely [o |α], which allows us to capture the notion of perceiving an observation given that an action has taken place. Formulae of the type [o |α]ϕ mean ’after perceiving observation o, given α was performed, necessarily ϕ’. In this paper, we focus on the challenges concerning sensing with explicit observations, and acting with nondeterministic effects. We present the syntax and semantics, and a correct and decidable tableau calculus for the logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Castilho, M., Gasquet, O., Herzig, A.: Formalizing action and change in modal logic I: The frame problem. Journal of Logic and Computation 9(5), 701–735 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Castilho, M., Herzig, A., Varzinczak, I.: It depends on the context! A decidable logic of actions and plans based on a ternary dependence relation. In: 9th International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, NMR 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demolombe, R., Herzig, A., Varzinczak, I.: Regression in modal logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13(2), 165–185 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gabaldon, A., Lakemeyer, G.: \(\mathcal{ESP}\): A logic of only-knowing, noisy sensing and acting. In: Proc. of 22nd Natl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007), pp. 974–979. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harel, D., Kozen, D., Tiuryn, J.: Dynamic Logic. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kooi, B.: Probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12(4), 381–408 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing 4, 67–95 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lakemeyer, G., Levesque, H.: A semantic characterization of a useful fragment of the situation calculus with knowledge. In: Special issue in honor of John McCarthy, Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy, J., Hayes, P.: Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Machine Intelligence 4, 463–502 (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Monahan, G.E.: A survey of partially observable Markov decision processes: Theory, models, and algorithms. Management Science 28(1), 1–16 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Popkorn, S.: First Steps in Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Reiter, R.: Knowledge in action: logical foundations for specifying and implementing dynamical systems. MIT Press, Massachusetts (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Rens, G., Varzinczak, I., Meyer, T.: Partially observable Markov decision logic, Part I: Introducing explicit observation constants, KRR-10-01. Tech. rep., Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Meraka Institute, CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa (June 2010), http://krr.meraka.org.za/publications/2010

  14. Sack, J.: Extending probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic. Synthese 169, 124–257 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Benthem, J., Gerbrandy, J., Kooi, B.: Dynamic update with probabilities. Studia Logica 93(1), 67–96 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Ditmarsch, H., Van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rens, G., Varzinczak, I., Meyer, T., Ferrein, A. (2010). A Logic for Reasoning about Actions and Explicit Observations. In: Li, J. (eds) AI 2010: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6464. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17432-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17432-2_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17431-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17432-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics