Skip to main content

On Approximate Nash Equilibria in Network Design

  • Conference paper
Internet and Network Economics (WINE 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6484))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study a basic network design game where n self-interested agents, each having individual connectivity requirements, wish to build a network by purchasing links from a given set of edges. A fundamental cost sharing mechanism is Shapley cost sharing that splits the cost of an edge in a fair manner among the agents using the edge. In this paper we investigate if an optimal minimum-cost network represents an attractive, relatively stable state that agents might want to purchase. We resort to the concept of α-approximate Nash equilibria. We prove that for single source games in undirected graphs, any optimal network represents an H(n)-approximate Nash equilibrium, where H(n) is the n-th Harmonic number. We show that this bound is tight. We extend the results to cooperative games, where agents may form coalitions, and to weighted games. In both cases we give tight or nearly tight lower and upper bounds on the stability of optimal solutions. Finally we show that in general source-sink games and in directed graphs, minimum-cost networks do not represent good states.

Work supported by a Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Award of the German Research Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albers, S.: On the value of coordination in network design. SIAM Journal on Computing 38, 2273–2302 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alon, N., Demaine, E.D., Hajiaghayi, M., Leighton, T.: Basic network creation games. In: Proc. 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, pp. 106–113 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aumann, R.J.: Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In: Tucker, A.W., Luce, R.D. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. IV. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 40, pp. 287–324 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Kleinberg, J.M., Tardos, E., Wexler, T., Roughgarden, T.: The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. SIAM Journal on Computing 38, 1602–1623 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Tardos, E., Wexler, T.: Near optimal network design with selfish agents. Theory of Computing 4, 77–109 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chekuri, C., Chuzhoy, J., Lewin-Eytan, L., Naor, J., Orda, A.: Non-cooperative multicast and facility location games. In: Proc. 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), pp. 72–81 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, H.-L., Roughgarden, T.: Network design with weighted players. Theory of Computing Systems 45, 302–324 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, H.-L., Roughgarden, T., Valiant, G.: Designing network protocols for good equilibria. SIAM Journal on Computing 39, 1799–1832 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Corbo, J., Parkes, D.: The price of selfish behavior in bilateral network formation. In: Proc. 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp. 99–107 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Demaine, E.D., Hajiaghayi, M., Mahini, H., Zadimoghaddam, M.: The price of anarchy in cooperative network creation games. In: Proc. 26th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), pp. 301–312 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Devanur, N.R., Mihail, M., Vazirani, V.V.: Strategyproof cost-sharing mechanisms for set cover and facility location games. Decision Support Systems 39, 11–22 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein, A., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games. In: Proc. 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 84–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fabrikant, A., Luthra, A., Maneva, E., Papadimitriou, C.H., Shenker, S.: On a network creation game. In: Proc. 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp. 347–351 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fiat, A., Kaplan, H., Levy, M., Olonetsky, S., Shabo, R.: On the price of stability for designing undirected networks with fair cost allocations. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 608–618. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta, A., Srinivasan, A., Tardos, E.: Cost-sharing mechanisms for network design. Algorithmica 50, 98–119 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Halevi, Y., Mansour, Y.: A network creation game with nonuniform interests. In: Deng, X., Graham, F.C. (eds.) WINE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4858, pp. 287–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoefer, M.: Non-cooperative tree creation. Algorithmica 53, 104–131 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.: Worst-case equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Laoutaris, N., Poplawski, L.J., Rajaraman, R., Sundaram, R., Teng, S.-H.: Bounded budget connection (BBC) games or how to make friends and influence people, on a budget. In: Proc. 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp. 165–174 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, T., Tardos, E.: Approximate pure Nash equilibria via Lovász local lemma. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 160–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Pal, M., Tardos, E.: Group strategyproof mechanisms via primal-dual algorithms. In: Proc. 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 584–593 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Albers, S., Lenzner, P. (2010). On Approximate Nash Equilibria in Network Design. In: Saberi, A. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6484. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17572-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17572-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17571-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17572-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics