Abstract
Co-operative computations in a network of sensor nodes rely on an established, interference free and repetitive communication between adjacent sensors. This paper analyzes a simple randomized and distributed protocol to establish a periodic communication schedule S where each sensor broadcasts once to communicate to all of its neighbors during each period of S. The result obtained holds for any bounded degree network. The existence of such randomized protocols is not new. Our protocol reduces the number of random bits and the number of transmissions by individual sensors from Θ(log2 n) to O(logn) where n is the number of sensor nodes. These reductions conserve power which is a critical resource. Both protocols assume upper bound on the number of nodes n and the maximum number of neighbors \({\cal B}\). For a small multiplicative (i.e., a factor ω(1)) increase in the resources, our algorithm can operate without an upper bound on \({\cal B}\).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abadi, D.J., Madden, S., Lindner, W.: Reed: Robust, efficient filtering and event detection in sensor networks. In: VLDB, pp. 769–780 (2005)
Bonnet, P., Gehrke, J., Seshadri, P.: Querying the physical world. IEEE Personal Communication Magazine, 10–15 (2000)
Gandhi, R., Parthasarathy, S.: Distributed algorithms for connected domination in wireless networks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 67(7), 848–862 (2007)
Juang, P., Oki, H., Wang, Y., Martonosi, M., Peh, L., Rubenstein, D.: [duplicate] energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: Design tradeoffs and early experiences with zebranet (2002)
Kalyanasundaram, B., Velauthapillai, M.: Communication complexity of continuous pattern detection. Unpublished manuscript (January 2009)
Karl, H., Willig, A.: Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2005)
Kim, S., Pakzad, S., Culler, D., Demmel, J., Fenves, G., Glaser, S., Turon, M.: Wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring. In: SenSys 2006: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 427–428. ACM, New York (2006)
Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Culler, D.: Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, pp. 88–97 (2002)
Paek, J., Chintalapudi, K., Govindan, R., Caffrey, J., Masri, S.: A wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: Performance and experience. In: The Second IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors, EmNetS-II 2005, pp. 1–10 (May 2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kalyanasundaram, B., Velauthapillai, M. (2011). Analysis of a Simple Randomized Protocol to Establish Communication in Bounded Degree Sensor Networks. In: Aguilera, M.K., Yu, H., Vaidya, N.H., Srinivasan, V., Choudhury, R.R. (eds) Distributed Computing and Networking. ICDCN 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6522. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17679-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17679-1_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17678-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17679-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)