Skip to main content

Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-agent Based Crowd Simulation Systems

  • Chapter
Agents for Games and Simulations II (AGS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6525))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a novel automated technique for the quantitative validation and comparison of multi-agent based crowd egress simulation systems. Despite much progress in the simulation technology itself, little attention has been accorded to the problem of validating these systems against reality. Previous approaches focused on local (spatial or temporal) crowd patterns, and either resorted to visual comparison (e.g., U-shaped crowd at bottlenecks), or relied on ad-hoc applications of measures such as egress rates, densities, etc. to compare with reality. To the best of our knowledge, we offer the first systematic and unified approach to validate the global performance of a multi-agent based crowd egress simulation system. We employ this technique to evaluate a multi-agent based crowd egress simulation system that we have also recently developed, and compare two different simulation technologies in this system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avalias. Crowdflow, http://www.avalias.com/products/crowdflow

  2. Banerjee, B., Bennett, M., Johnson, M., Ali, A.: Congestion avoidance in multi-agent-based egress simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI), Las Vegas, USA (2008) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee, B., Kraemer, L.: Validation of agent based crowd egress simulation (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2010), Toronto, Canada, pp. 1551–1552 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braun, A., Musse, S.R., de Oliveira, L.P.L., Bodmann, B.E.J.: Modeling individual behaviors in crowd simulation. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents (CASA), pp. 143–148. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fukui, M., Ishibashi, Y.: Self-organized phase transitions in CA-models for pedestrians. J. Phys. Soc., 2861–2863 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Helbing, D., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407, 487–490 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Helbing, D., Molnar, P.: Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E 51, 42–82 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helleboogh, A., Holvoet, T., Weyns, D., Berbers, Y.: Extending time management support for multi-agent systems. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishida, T., Nakajima, Y., Murakami, Y., Nakanishi, H.: Augmented experiment: participatory design with multiagent simulation. In: IJCAI 2007: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 1341–1346. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDonnell, R., Larkin, M., Dobbyn, S., Collins, S., O’Sullivan, C.: Clone attack! Perception of crowd variety. In: SIGGRAPH (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miyashita, K.: ASAP: Agent-based simulator for amusement park. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 195–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Murakami, Y., Ishida, T., Kawasoe, T., Hishiyama, R.: Scenario description for multi-agent simulation. In: AAMAS 2003: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 369–376. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. The National Center for Spectator Sports Safety and Security, http://www.sporteventsecurity.com/

  14. Pan, X., Han, C., Dauber, K., Law, K.: A multi-agent based framework for simulating human and social behaviors during emergency evacuations. In: Social Intelligence Design, March 2005. Stanford University, Stanford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pelechano, N., Stocker, C., Allbeck, J., Badler, N.: Being a part of the crowd: Towards validating VR crowds using presence. In: Padgham, M., Parkes, Parsons (eds.) Proc. of 7th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2008), Estoril, Portugal, May 12-16, pp. 136–142 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Regal-Decision-Systems. Evacuation planning tool, http://www.regaldecision.com/ept.php

  17. Reynolds, C.: Steering behaviors for autonomous characters, http://www.red3d.com/cwr/steer/

  18. Reynolds, C.: Flocks, herds and schools: A distrtibuted behavior model. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rymill, S., Dodgson, N.: A psychologically based simulation of human behavior. In: Eurographics UK Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sargent, R.G.: Verification and validation of simulation models. In: WSC 2008: Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation, pp. 157–169 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shao, W., Terzopoulos, D.: Autonomous pedestrians. In: Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Computer Animation (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thalmann, D., Musse, S., Kallmann, M.: From individual human agents to crowds. In: Informatik/Informatique - Revue des organizations suisses d’informatique (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Torii, D., Ishida, T., Bonneaud, S., Drogoul, A.: Layering social interaction scenarios on environmental simulation. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 78–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Ulicny, B., Thalmann, D.: Towards interactive real-time crowd behavior simulation. Computer Graphics Forum 21(4) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, F., Turner, S.J., Wang, L.: Agent communication in distributed simulations. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 11–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Banerjee, B., Kraemer, L. (2011). Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-agent Based Crowd Simulation Systems. In: Dignum, F. (eds) Agents for Games and Simulations II. AGS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6525. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18181-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18181-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18180-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18181-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics