Skip to main content

Declarative Belief Set Merging Using Merging Plans

  • Conference paper
Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages (PADL 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6539))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a declarative framework for belief set merging tasks over (possibly heterogeneous) knowledge bases, where belief sets are sets of literals. The framework is designed generically for flexible deployment to a range of applications, and allows to specify complex merging tasks in tree-structured merging plans, whose leaves are the possible belief sets of the knowledge bases that are processed using merging operators. A prototype is implemented in MELD (MErging Library for Dlvhex) on top of the dlvhex system for hex-programs, which are nonmonotonic logic programs with access to external sources. Plans in the task description language allow to formulate different conflict resolution strategies, and by shared object libraries, the user may also develop and integrate her own merging operators. MELD supports rapid prototyping of merging tasks, providing a computational backbone such that users can focus on operator optimization and evaluation, and on experimenting with merging strategies; this is particularly useful if a best merging operator or strategy is not known. Example applications are combining multiple decision diagrams (e.g., in biomedicine), judgment aggregation in social choice theory, and ontology merging.

Support: Austrian Science Fund P20841 and Vienna Science and Technology Fund ICT 08-020.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bahar, R.I., Frohm, E.A., Gaona, C.M., Hachtel, G.D., Macii, E., Pardo, A., Somenzi, F.: Algebraic decision diagrams and their applications. In: ICCAD 1993, pp. 188–191 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dalal, M.: Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision. In: AAAI, pp. 475–479 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dasgupta, P.S., Hammond, P.J., Maskin, E.S.: The implementation of social choice rules: Some general results on incentive compatibility. Rev. Econ. Stud. 46(2), 185–216 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Delgrande, J.P., Liu, D.H., Schaub, T., Thiele, S.: COBA 2.0: A Consistency-Based Belief Change System. In: Mellouli, K. (ed.) ECSQARU 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4724, pp. 78–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: A uniform integration of higher-order reasoning and external evaluations in answer-set programming. In: IJCAI 2005, pp. 90–96 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: dlvhex: A system for integrating multiple semantics in an answer-set programming framework. In: WLP 2006, pp. 206–210 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generat. Comput. 9(3-4), 365–385 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hué, J., Papini, O., Würbel, E.: Merging belief bases represented by logic programs. In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds.) ECSQARU 2009. LNCS, vol. 5590, pp. 371–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Konieczny, S., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: DA2 merging operators. AIJ 157(1-2), 49–79 (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Konieczny, S., Pérez, R.P.: On the logic of merging. In: KR 1998, pp. 488–498 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: Arbitration (or how to merge knowledge bases). IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 10(1), 76–90 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liew, A.W.C., Wu, Y., Yan, H.: Selection of statistical features based on mutual information for classification of human coding and non-coding DNA sequences. In: ICPR, pp. 766–769 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, J., Mendelzon, A.: Knowledge base merging by majority. In: Dynamic Worlds: From the Frame problem to Knowledge Management. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Redl, C.: Development of a belief merging framewerk for dlvhex. Master’s thesis, Vienna University of Technology, A-1040 Vienna, Karlsplatz 13 (June 2010), http://media.obvsg.at/AC07808210-2001

  15. Redl, C.: Merging of biomedical decision diagrams. Master’s thesis, Vienna University of Technology, A-1040 Vienna, Karlsplatz 13 (October 2010), http://media.obvsg.at/AC07808795-2001

  16. Revesz, P.: On the semantics of arbitration. Intl. J. Algebra Comput. 7(2), 133–160 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Salzberg, S.: Locating protein coding regions in human DNA using a decision tree algorithm. J. Comput. Biol. 2, 473–485 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salzberg, S., Delcher, A.L., Fasman, K.H., Henderson, J.: A decision tree system for finding genes in DNA. J. Comput. Biol. 5(4), 667–680 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobin, L., Gospodarowicz, M., Wittekind, C.: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th edn. Wiley, Chichester (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sree, P.K., Babu, I.R., Murty, J.V.R., Rao, P.S.: Towards an artificial immune system to identify and strengthen protein coding region identification using cellular automata classifier. Intl. J. Comput. Commun. 1(2), 26–34 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sree, P.K., Babu, I.R.: Identification of protein coding regions in genomic DNA using unsupervised FMACA based pattern classifier. Intl. J. Comp. Sci. Netw. Secur. 8(1), 305–309 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stumme, G., Maedche, A.: FCA-MERGE: Bottom-Up Merging of Ontologies. In: IJCAI 2001, pp. 225–230 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Redl, C., Eiter, T., Krennwallner, T. (2011). Declarative Belief Set Merging Using Merging Plans. In: Rocha, R., Launchbury, J. (eds) Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages. PADL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6539. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18378-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18378-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18377-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18378-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics