Skip to main content

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Interpretations of Conway’s Game of Life

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6046))

Abstract

Conway’s Game of Life is a popular heuristic zero-player game, devised by John Horton Conway in 1970, and it is the best-known example of a cellular automaton. Its “universe” is an infinite two-dimensional orthogonal grid of square cells, each of which is in one of two possible states, alive or dead. Every cell interacts with its eight neighbours, which are the cells that are directly horizontally, vertically, or diagonally adjacent. In a stepwise manner, the state of each cell in the grid preserves or alternates with respect to a given list of rules. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFS) are an extension of Zadeh’s fuzzy sets, which introduce a degree of membership and a degree of non-membership whose sum is equal to or less than 1 and the complement to 1 is called a degree of uncertainty. The article proposes an intuitionistic fuzzy estimation of the cells’ state in a modified Game of Life. For each cell we can define its IF estimation as a pair consisting of the degrees l p and l a , namely degrees of presence and absence of life, where l p  + l a  ≤ 1. In the classical Conway’s Game of Life, the alive and dead states correspond to the elementary IF estimations 〈1,0 〉 and 〈0,1 〉. The article presents the formulas for calculating the IF state of liveliness of each cell, as functions of the current states of the cell’s neighbours. Criteria of liveliness will be also determined in terms of IFS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conway’s Game of Life. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (May 8, 2010), http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conway’s_Game_of_Life&oldid=360850256

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov, K., Atanassova, L.: A game method for modelling. In: Antonov, L. (ed.) Third International School, Automation and Scientific Instrumentation, Varna, pp. 229–232 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atanassov, K.: On a combinatorial game-method for modelling. In: Advances in Modelling & Analysis, vol. 19(2), pp. 41–47. AMSE Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atanassov, K., Atanassova, L., Sasselov, D.: On the combinatorial game-method for modelling in astronomy. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie bulgare des Sciences, Tome 47(9), 5–7 (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Atanassova, L., Atanassov, K. (2011). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Interpretations of Conway’s Game of Life. In: Dimov, I., Dimova, S., Kolkovska, N. (eds) Numerical Methods and Applications. NMA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18466-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18466-6_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18465-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18466-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics