Skip to main content

Cross-Lingual Evaluation of Ontologies with Rudify

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 128))

Abstract

Rudify is a set of tools used for automatically annotating concepts in an ontology with the ontological meta-properties employed by OntoClean [1]. While OntoClean provides a methodology for evaluating ontological hierarchies based on ontological meta-properties of the concepts in the hierarchy, it does not provide a method for determining the meta-properties of a given concept within an ontology. Rudify has been developed to help bridge this gap, and has been used in the KYOTO project to facilitate ontology development. The general idea behind Rudify is the assumption that a preferred set of linguistic expressions is used when talking about ontological meta-properties. Thus, one can deduce a concept’s meta-properties from the usage of the concept’s lexical representation (LR) in natural language. This paper describes the theory behind Rudify, the development of Rudify, and evaluates Rudify’s output for the rigidity of base concepts in English, Dutch, and Spanish. Our overall conclusion is that the decisive output for English is useable data, while the procedure currently exploited by Rudify does not easily carry over to Spanish and Dutch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: An Overview of OntoClean. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 151–172. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A.: Sweetening WordNet with Dolce. AI Magazine 24(3), 13–24 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM 45(2), 61–65 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Welty, C., Guarino, N.: Supporting Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering 39(1), 51–74 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyes-Braem, P.: Basic Objects in Natural Categories. Cognitve Psychology 8, 382–439 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka, J.W., Taylor, M.: Object Categories and Expertise: Is the Basic Level in the Eye of the Beholder? Cognitve Psychology 23, 457–482 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Izquierdo, R., Suárez, A., Rigau, G.: Exploring the Automatic Selection of Basic Level Concepts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances on Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2007) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kilgarriff, A.: Googleology is Bad Science. Computational Linguistics 33, 147–151 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Völker, J., Vrandecic, D., Sure, Y.: Automatic Evaluation of Ontologies (AEON). In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 716–731. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Völker, J., Vrandecic, D., Sure, Y., Hotho, A.: AEON – An Approach to the Automatic Evaluation of Ontologies. Applied Ontology 3(1-2), 41–62 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bird, S., Klein, E., Loper, E.: Natural Language Processing with Python. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Vossen, P., Agirre, E., Calzolari, N., Fellbaum, C., Hsieh, S., Huang, C., Isahara, H., Kanzaki, K., Marchetti, A., Monachini, M., Neri, F., Raffaelli, R., Rigau, G., Tesconi, M.: KYOTO: A System for Mining, Structuring and Distributing Knowledge Across Languages and Cultures. In: Proceedings of LREC 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herold, A., Hicks, A., Rigau, G.: Central Ontology Version 1. Deliverable D6.2, KYOTO Project (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herold, A., Hicks, A., Segers, R., Vossen, P., Rigau, G., Agirre, E., Laparra, E., Monachini, M., Toral, A., Soria, C.: Wordnets Mapped to Central Ontology Version 1. Deliverable D6.3, KYOTO Project (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hicks, A., Herold, A. (2011). Cross-Lingual Evaluation of Ontologies with Rudify. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowlege Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 128. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19032-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19032-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19031-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19032-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics