Abstract
The technical capacities of service offers for e-government and e-participation have considerably progressed over the last years. Yet, the principles of good governance are still not well implemented, especially when it comes to policy development. Governments struggle to effectively apply innovative technologies in regards to providing open collaboration in policy formulation or to monitor and evaluate policy implementation. Through a recent initiative of the European Commission (EC), several research projects have been launched to address these challenges. This paper first investigates existing deficiencies in open government towards transparent policy development. Subsequently, an approach of a project funded by the EC is introduced to develop better ICT support for open collaboration in policy modeling. The approach combines existing e-participation tools, collaborative scenario generation and formal policy modeling to evaluate and explore policies via agent-based modeling (OCOPOMO - www.ocopomo.eu).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, P.W., Arrow, K., Pines, D. (eds.): The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Addison-Wesley Longman, Redwood (1988)
Apostolou, D., Babic, F., Bafoutsou, G., Butka, P., Dioudis, S., Mach, M., Macintosh, A., Gordon, T., Halaris, C., Kafentzis, K., Mentzas, G., Paralic, M., Paralic, J., Renton, A., Rosendahl, A., Sabol, T., Schneider, C., Thorleifsdottir, A., Wimmer, M.: D5.2 - eParticipation: The potential of new and emerging technologies (2007) DEMO-net consortium, http://www.demo-net.org
Arthur, W.B.: Complexity and the Economy. In: Colander, D. (ed.) The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics. Edward Elgar (2000)
Barzilai-Nahon, K., Scholl, H.J.: Siblings of a Different Kind: E-Government and E-Commerce. In: Wimmer, M., Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Chappelet, J.-L. (eds.) EGOV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6228, pp. 25–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Botterman, M., Millard, J., Horlings, E., van Oranje, C., van Deelen, M., Pedersen, K.: Value for citizens - A vision of public governance in 2020. European Commission (2008), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/egovernment/studies/docs/final_report_web.pdf (accessed 17/10/2010)
Camazine, S.: Self-organizing systems. In: Nadel, L. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, pp. 1059–1062. Elsevier, New York (2003)
Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. Wiley, Chichester (1995)
Codagnone, C., Wimmer, M.A. (eds.): Roadmapping eGovernment Research: Visions and Measures towards Innovative Governments in 2020. MY Print snc di Guerinoni Marco & C, Clusone (2007)
Cortelezzi, F., Villani, G.: Valuation of R&D Sequential Exchange Options Using Monte Carlo Approach. Journal of Computational Economics 33(3), 209–236 (2009)
Epstein, J.M.: Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press, New York (2006)
eTen, eTen Program: support for trans-European telecommunications networks. Trans-European Telecommunications Networks (2007), http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/information_society/l24226e_en.htm (accessed 18/10/2010)
European Commission. Lisbon European Council 23 And 24 March 2000 (2000), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm (accessed 18/10/2010)
European Commission, European Governance, A white paper, COM (2001) 428 final, Brussels (25.7.2001), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf (accessed 18/10/2010)
European Commission. eEurope 2005. An information society for all: An Action Plan to be presented in view of the Sevilla European Council, COM (2002) 263 final. Brussel (2002), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/2002/news_library/documents/eeurope2005/eeurope2005_en.pdf (accessed 18/10/2010)
European Commission. Establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013), COM (2005) 121 final. Brussels (2005), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0121:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed 18/10/2010)
European Commission. i2010 - A European Information Society for growth and employment, COM (2005) 229 final. Brussels (2005), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0229:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed 18/10/2010)
European Commission: A Digital Agenda for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2010) 245 final/2, Brussels (26.8.2010), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed 18/10/2010)
Fletcher, M., Vrba, P.: A Brace of Agent Simulation Scenarios. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS 2006), pp. 169–176 (2006)
Fraser, C., Liotas, N., Lippa, B., Mach, M., Macintosh, A., Marzano, F., Mentzas, G., Rosendahl, A., Sabol, T., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K., Thorleifsdottir, A., Westholm, H., Wimmer, M.: D5.1 - Report on current ICTs to enable Participation. DEMO-net consortium (2006), www.demo-net.org -> Results (accessed 17/10/2010)
Gausemeier, J., Fink, A., Schlake, O.: Szenario-Management: Planen und Führen mit Szenarien. München, Hanser (1995)
Gell-Mann, M.: The quark and the jaguar: Adventure in the simple and the complex. Freeman, New York (1994)
Gkarafli, M., Papadopoulos, A., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: D14.3c: The role of Web 2.0 technologies in eParticipation, DEMO-net consortium (2007), http://www.demo-net.org
Grönlund, A.: Ten Years of eGovernment: The ‘End of History’ and New Beginning. In: Wimmer, M.A., Chappelet, J.-L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6228, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Guastaroba, G., Mansini, R., Grazia Speranza, M.: Models and Simulations for Portfolio Rebalancing. Journal of Computational Economics 33(3), 237–262 (2009)
Haken, H.: Synergetics. Springer, Berlin (1978)
He, L.T., Hu, C.: Impacts of Interval Computing on Stock Market Variability Forecasting. Journal of Computational Economics 33(3), 263–276 (2009)
Holland, J.H.: Emergence: From chaos to order. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)
Janssen, M., van der Duin, P., Wimmer, M.A.: Framework and Methodology: Methodology for scenario building. In: 8, pp. 23–28 (2007)
Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Bicking, M., Wagenaar, R.W.: Scenarios of governments in 2020. In: 8, pp. 55–84 (2007)
Jennings, N.R., Bussman, S.: Agent-Based Control Systems: Why are They Suited to Engineering Complex Systems? IEEE Control Systems Magazine 23(3), 61–73 (2003)
Johnson, S.: Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software. Scribner, New York (2001)
Kelso, J.A.S.: Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Klein, L.R.: The use of econometric models for policy purposes’. Econometrica 15 (1947)
Levy, M., Levy, H., Solomon, S.: Microscopic Simulation of Financial Markets: From Investor Behavior to Market phenomena. Academic Press, New York (2000)
Macintosh, A.: Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37), Track 5, vol. 5, p. 50117a. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington (2004), http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265300
Macintosh, A. (ed.): The Initial DEMO-net Landscape. Deliverable D4.1, DEMO-net Consortium (2006), http://www.demo-net.org -> Results
Miller, J.H., Page, S.E.: Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton University Press, New York (2006)
Moss, S.: Competition in Internal Markets: Statistical Signatures and Critical Densities. CPM Report Number 01-79, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK (2001)
Moss, S., Edmonds, B., Wallis, S.: The Power Law and Critical Density in Large Multi-Agent Systems. CPM Report Number 00-71, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK (2000)
Nakicenovic, N., Swart, R.: Emissions Scenarios: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Nowak, A.: Personality and Social Psychology Review 8(2), 183–192 (2004)
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., Latane’, B.: From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 97, 362–376 (1990)
OECD: Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement for Better Policy and Services, OECD Studies on Public Engagement. OECD Publishing (2009) doi: 10.1787/9789264048874-en
Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: Order out of chaos. Bantam, Toronto (1984)
Rose, J., Sæbø, O., Nyvang, T., Sanford, C.: D14.3a: The role of Social networking software in eParticipation. DEMO-net consortium (2007), http://www.demo-net.org
Rosser, J.B.: On the Complexities of Complex Economic Dynamics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 13, 169–192 (1999)
Scherer, S., Wimmer, M.A., Schneider, C.: Investigating Information and Knowledge Management (IKM) in eDeliberation. In: Cunningham, P., Cunningham, M. (eds.) Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies, pp. 270–277. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)
Stephan, A.: Emergence. In: Nadel, L. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, pp. 1108–1115. Nature Publishing Group, London (2003)
Strid, I., Walentin, K.: Block Kalman: Filtering for Large-Scale DSGE Models. Journal of Computational Economics 33(3), 277–304 (2009)
Tobias, R., Hofmann, C.: Evaluation of free Java-libraries for social-scientific agent based simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 7(1), 6 (2004), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/1/6.html
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP): What is good governance?
Wellens, T., Kuś, M.: Separable approximation for mixed states of composite quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 64, 052302 (2001)
Wimmer, M.A.: Integrated service modeling for online one-stop Government. EM - Electronic Markets, Special Issue on e-Government 12(3), 1–8 (2002)
Wimmer, M.A.: The Role of Research in Successful E-Government Implementation. In: Zechner, A. (ed.) E-Government Guide Germany. Strategies, Solutions and Efficiency, Stuttgart, pp. 79–87. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag (2007)
Wimmer, M.A.: Introduction. In: [8], pp. 1–9
Wimmer, M.A., Codagnone, C.: Framework and Methodology: Definitions for eGovernment. In: [8], pp. 11–12
Wimmer, M.A., Traunmüller, R.: Integration - The Next Challenge in e-Government. In: Far, B.H., Shafazand, M.H., Takizawa, M., Wagner, R. (eds.) EurAsia-ICT 2002 - Advances in Information and Communication Technology, pp. 213–218, Book series # 161. Austrian Computer Society (2002)
Wimmer, M.A., von Bredow, B.: A Holistic Approach for Providing Security Solutions in e-Government. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35) at Big Island of Hawaii (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wimmer, M.A. (2011). Open Government in Policy Development: From Collaborative Scenario Texts to Formal Policy Models. In: Natarajan, R., Ojo, A. (eds) Distributed Computing and Internet Technology. ICDCIT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6536. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19056-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19056-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19055-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19056-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)