Abstract
In this paper we describe a method for modeling social behavior of large groups, and apply it to the problem of predicting potential violence during demonstrations. We use qualitative reasoning techniques which to our knowledge have never been applied to modeling crowd behaviors, nor in particular to demonstrations. Such modeling may not only contribute to the police decision making process, but can also provide a great opportunity to test existing theories in social science. We incrementally present and compare three qualitative models, based on social science theories. The results show that while two of these models fail to predict the outcomes of real-world events reported and analyzed in the literature, one model is successful. We believe that this demonstrates the efficacy of qualitative reasoning in the development and testing of social sciences theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bredeweg, B., Salles, P.: Mediating conceptual knowledge using qualitative reasoning. In: Jrgensen, S., Chon, T.-S., Recknagel, F.E. (eds.) Handbook of Ecological Modelling and Informatics, pp. 351–398. Wit Press, Southampton (2009)
Carmeli, A., Ravid-Yamin, I.: Research report on the subject of crowd events and public order. Technical report, Ministry of public security, Bureau of the chief scientist (2006)
Forbus, K.D.: Qualitative reasoning. In: CRC Handbook of Computer Science and Eng. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1996)
Forbus, K.D., Kuehne, S.E.: Towards a qualitative model of everyday political reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Qualitative Reasoning Workshop (2005)
Fridman, N., Kaminka, G.A.: Towards a cognitive model of crowd behavior based on social comparison theory. In: AAAI 2007 (2007)
Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.G.: Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press, Stony Stratford (2005)
Jager, W., Popping, R., van de Sande, H.: Clustering and fighting in two-party crowds: simulating the approach-avoidance conflict. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4(3) (2001)
Kamps, J., Péli, G.: Qualitative reasoning beyond the physics domain: The density dependence theory of organizational ecology. In: Proceedings of QR 1995 (1995)
Kosko, B.: Fuzzy cognitive maps: advances in theory, methodologies, tools and applications (studies in fuzziness and soft computing). Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Kuipers, B.: Qualitative reasoning: modeling and simulation with incomplete knowledge. Automatica 25(4) (1989)
Lewis, J.M.: A value-added analysis of the heysel stadium soccer riot. Current Psychology (1989)
Patrick, S., Dorman, P.M., Marsh, R.L.: Simulating correctional disturbances: the application of organization control theory to correctional organizations via computer simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2(1) (1999)
Salles, P., Bredeweg, B.: Modelling population and community dynamics with qualitative reasoning. Ecological Modelling 195, 114–128 (2006)
Stott, C., Drury, J.: Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization process in the ṕoll tax riot.́ Human Relations (2000)
Useem, B.: The state and collective disorders: The los angeles riot/protest of april 1992. Social Forces 76 (1997)
Wander, J.: Modelling consumer behavior. PhD thesis, University of Groningen (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fridman, N., Zilberstein, T., Kaminka, G.A. (2011). Predicting Demonstrations’ Violence Level Using Qualitative Reasoning. In: Salerno, J., Yang, S.J., Nau, D., Chai, SK. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. SBP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6589. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19656-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19656-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19655-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19656-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)