Skip to main content

Coordination by Contracts in Decentralized Product Design Processes – Towards Efficient Compliance with Recycling Rates in the Automotive Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Operations Research Proceedings 2010

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP))

  • 1181 Accesses

Abstract

Design processes in the automotive industry are distributed over various companies. If fixed-price contracts are used to coordinate such collaborations, inefficiencies in the design process occur due to existing uncertainties and differing objectives of the partners. To make decentralized design processes more flexible and to reduce inefficiencies, we introduce the conceptual design of incentive contracts and apply it to the case of the compliance with recycling rates in the automotive industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Anupindi and Y. Bassok. Supply contracts with quantity commitments and stochastic demand. In Quantitative models for supply chain management, pages 197–232. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bolton and M. Dewatripont. Contract theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Kruse, C. Thomsen, R. Ernst, T. Volling, and T.S. Spengler. Introducing flexible quantity contracts into distributed SoC and embedded system design processes. In Proceedings of the conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pages 938–943, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Kruse, C. Thomsen, R. Ernst, T. Volling, and T.S. Spengler. Towards flexible systems engineering by using flexible quantity contracts. In Proceedings of the conference on Automation, Assistance and Embedded Real Time Platforms for Transportation, pages 480–488, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5. J. Rox, K. Schmidt, A. Winter, T.S. Spengler, and R. Ernst. Estimating and mitigating design risk in a flexible distributed design process. IEEE Embedded Systems Letters, 2(2): 35–38, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A.A. Tsay. The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management science, 45(10): 1339–1358, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.A. Tsay, S. Nahmias, and N. Agrawal. Modeling supply chain contracts: A review. In Quantitative models for supply chain management, pages 299–336. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerstin Schmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schmidt, K., Volling, T., Spengler, T.S. (2011). Coordination by Contracts in Decentralized Product Design Processes – Towards Efficient Compliance with Recycling Rates in the Automotive Industry. In: Hu, B., Morasch, K., Pickl, S., Siegle, M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2010. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20009-0_69

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics