Skip to main content

Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Models: Evaluation Methods

  • Conference paper
  • 1077 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6588))

Abstract

This paper uses a real world anaesthesia time-series monitoring data in the prediction of cardiovascular disease risk in a manner similar to exercise electrocardiography. Models derived using the entire anaesthesia population and subgroups based on pre-anaesthesia likelihood of complications are compared in an attempt to ascertain which model performance measures are best suited to populations with differing pre-test probability of disease. Misclassification rate (MR) as a measure of prediction model performance was compared with Kappa statistic, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). In this medical application of data mining, MR is shown to be dependent on the prevalence of disease within the population studied but AUC and Kappa statistic are shown to be independent of disease prevalence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. WHO, D. UN Data: Age-standardized mortality rate for cardiovascular disease (per 100,000 population), http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=WHO&f=inID%3aMBD22 [cited 2009, February 7]

  2. Pearson, T., et al.: AHA guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: 2002 update: consensus panel guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patient without coronary or other vascular disease. Circulation 106, 388–391 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mora, S., et al.: Enhanced Risk Assessment in Asymptomatic Individuals With Exercise Testing and Framingham Risk Scores. Circulation 112, 1566–1572 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellazzi, R., Zupan, B.: Predictive data mining in clinical medicine: Current issues and guidelines. International Journal of Medical Informatics 77(2), 81–97 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramon, J., et al.: Mining data from intensive care patients. Advanced Engineering Informatics 21(3), 243–256 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Luaces, O., et al.: Predicting the probability of survival in intensive care unit patients from a small number of variables and training examples. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 45(1), 63–76 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, B.H., et al.: Application of irregular and unbalanced data to predict diabetic nephropathy using visualization and feature selection methods. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 42(1), 37–53 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, L., et al.: Decision tool for the early diagnosis of trauma patient hypovolemia. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41(3), 469–478 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cios, K.J., Moore, G.W.: Uniqueness of medical data mining. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 26(1-2), 1–24 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sokolova, M., Lapalme, G.: A systemic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Information Processing and Management 45, 427–437 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Credibility: Evaluating What’s Been Learned. In: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, p. 173. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Armitage, P., Berry, G.: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Blackwell Sciences Pty, Ltd., Malden (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nayak, R., Pitt, E. (2011). Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Models: Evaluation Methods. In: Yu, J.X., Kim, M.H., Unland, R. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6588. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20152-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20152-3_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20151-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20152-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics