Skip to main content

Understanding Permissions through Graphical Norms

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6619))

Abstract

Norm-aware agents are able to reason about the obligations, permissions and prohibitions that affect their operation. While much work has focused on the creation of such norm-aware agents, less effort has been placed on enabling system designers and users to understand the interactions between norms. Providing designers with such an understanding can aid in eliminating redundant norms and errors in norm specifications, while enhancing user understanding can increase the trust placed in a system. In this paper we make use of conceptual graph based semantics to provide a graphical representation that is designed to enhance the understanding of the interactions between different types of norms. More specifically, permissions derogate obligations and prohibitions, and the latter two norm types interact by conflicting with each other. Tracking these interactions in standard symbolic norm representations is difficult given a large set of norms, yet our work allows for the easy understanding of whether a permission causes obligation or prohibition derogation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Permissions and obligations in hierarchical normative systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 109–118 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chein, M., Mugnier, M.-L.: Graph-based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs. Springer, London (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Croitoru, M., Oren, N., Miles, S., Luck, M.: Graph-based norm explanation. In: Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVII, Proceedings of AI 2010: The Thirtieth SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 35–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Governatori, G., Hulstijn, J., Riveret, R., Rotolo, A.: Characterising deadlines in temporal modal defeasible logic. In: Orgun, M.A., Thornton, J. (eds.) AI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4830, pp. 486–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Groth, P., Miles, S., Modgil, S., Oren, N., Luck, M., Gil, Y.: Determining the trustworthiness of new electronic contracts. In: Aldewereld, H., Dignum, V., Picard, G. (eds.) ESAW 2009. LNCS, vol. 5881, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kowalski, R.A., Sergot, M.J.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing 4(1), 67–95 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Miles, S., Groth, P., Luck, M.: Handling mitigating circumstances for electronic contracts. In: Proceedings of the AISB 2008 Symposium on Behaviour Regulation in Multi-agent Systems, pp. 37–42. The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Modgil, S., Faci, N., Meneguzzi, F., Oren, N., Miles, S., Luck, M.: A framework for monitoring agent-based normative systems. In: Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 153–160 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mugnier, M.-L., Leclère, M.: On querying simple conceptual graphs with negation. Data Knowledge Engineering 60, 468–493 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oren, N., Panagiotidi, S., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Modgil, S., Luck, M., Miles, S.: Towards a formalisation of electronic contracting environments. In: Hübner, J.F., Matson, E.T., Boissier, O., Dignum, V. (eds.) COIN@AAMAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5428, pp. 156–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Graphs. IBM Journal of Research and Development 20(4), 336–375 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Stolpe, A.: Relevance, derogation and permission: a case for a normal form for codes of norms. In: Governatori, G., Sartor, G. (eds.) DEON 2010. LNCS, vol. 6181, pp. 98–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oren, N., Croitoru, M., Miles, S., Luck, M. (2011). Understanding Permissions through Graphical Norms. In: Omicini, A., Sardina, S., Vasconcelos, W. (eds) Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies VIII. DALT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6619. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20715-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20715-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20714-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20715-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics