Abstract
Existing preference prediction techniques can require that an entire preference structure be constructed for a user. These structures, such as Conditional Outcome Preference Networks (COP-nets), can grow exponentially in the number of attributes describing the outcomes. In this paper, a new approach for constructing COP-nets, using A* search, is introduced. Using this approach, partial COP-nets can be constructed on demand instead of generating the entire structure. Experimental results show that the new method yields enormous savings in time and memory requirements, with only a modest reduction in prediction accuracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21, 135–191 (2004)
Boutilier, C., Patrascu, R., Poupart, P., Schuurmans, D.: Regret-based utility elicitation in constraint-based decision problems. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2005, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 929–934 (2005)
Chajewska, U., Koller, D., Parr, R.: Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. In: AAAI 2000, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 363–369 (2000)
Chen, S.: Reasoning with conditional preferences across attributes. Master’s thesis, University of New Brunswick (2006)
Chen, S., Buffett, S., Fleming, M.W.: Reasoning with conditional preferences across attributes. In: Proc. of AI 2007, Montreal, Canada, pp. 369–380 (2007)
Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142, 205–237 (2002)
Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Optimal negotiation of multiple issues in incomplete information settings. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, New York, NY, pp. 1080–1087 (2004)
Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Int. J. of Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2), 199–215 (2001)
Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Chichester (1976)
Sandholm, T., Boutilier, C.: Preference elicitation in combinatorial auctions. In: Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., Steinberg, R. (eds.) Combinatorial Auctions (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bediako-Asare, H., Buffett, S., Fleming, M.W. (2011). Utility Estimation in Large Preference Graphs Using A* Search. In: Butz, C., Lingras, P. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6657. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21043-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21043-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21042-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21043-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)