Skip to main content

When Does It Pay Off to Use Sophisticated Entailment Engines in ILP?

  • Conference paper
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6489))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 770 Accesses

Abstract

Entailment is an important problem in computational logic particularly relevant to the Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) community as it is at the core of the hypothesis coverage test which is often the bottleneck of an ILP system. Despite developments in resolution heuristics and, more recently, in subsumption engines, most ILP systems simply use Prolog’s left-to-right, depth-first search selection function for SLD-resolution to perform the hypothesis coverage test.

We implemented two alternative selection functions for SLD-resolution: smallest predicate domain (SPD) and smallest variable domain (SVD); and developed a subsumption engine, Subsumer. These entailment engines were fully integrated into the ILP system ProGolem.

The performance of these four entailment engines is compared on a representative set of ILP datasets. As expected, on determinate datasets Prolog’s built-in resolution, is unrivalled. However, in the presence of even little non-determinism, its performance quickly degrades and a sophisticated entailment engine is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blockeel, H., Dehaspe, L., Demoen, B., Janssens, G., Ramon, J., Vandecasteele, H.: Improving the efficiency of Inductive Logic Programming through the use of query packs. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 16, 135–166 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Botta, M., Giordana, A., Saitta, L., Sebag, M.: Relational learning as search in a critical region. Journal of Machine Learning Research 4, 431–463 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Santos Costa, V., Sagonas, K.F., Lopes, R.: Demand-Driven Indexing of Prolog Clauses. In: Dahl, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) ICLP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4670, pp. 395–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Santos Costa, V., Srinivasan, A., Camacho, R., Blockeel, H., Demoen, B., Janssens, G., Struyf, J., Vandecasteele, H., Van Laer, W.: Query transformations for improving the efficiency of ILP systems. Journal of Machine Learning Research 4, 465–491 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapur, D., Narendran, P.: Np-completeness of the set unification and matching problems. In: Siekmann, J.H. (ed.) CADE 1986. LNCS, vol. 230, pp. 489–495. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kowalski, R.A., Kuehner, D.: Linear resolution with selection function. Artif. Intell. 2(3/4), 227–260 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuzelka, O., Zelezný, F.: Fast estimation of first-order clause coverage through randomization and maximum likelihood. In: Cohen, W.W., McCallum, A., Roweis, S.T. (eds.) ICML. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 307, pp. 504–511. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuzelka, O., Zelezný, F.: A restarted strategy for efficient subsumption testing. Fundam. Inform. 89(1), 95–109 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Maloberti, J., Sebag, M.: Fast theta-subsumption with constraint satisfaction algorithms. Machine Learning 55(2), 137–174 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Markovitch, S., Scott, P.D.: Automatic ordering of subgoals - a machine learning approach. In: NACLP, pp. 224–240 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muggleton, S., Santos, J., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A.: ProGolem: A system based on relative minimal generalisation. In: De Raedt, L. (ed.) ILP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5989, pp. 131–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Alan Robinson, J.: A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle. J. ACM 12(1), 23–41 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos, J., Muggleton, S.: Subsumer: A Prolog theta-subsumption engine. In: Technical communications of the 26th Int. Conference on Logic Programming, Leibniz International Proc. in Informatics, Edinburgh, Scotland (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sebag, M., Rouveirol, C.: Tractable induction and classification in first order logic via stochastic matching. In: IJCAI, vol. (2), pp. 888–893 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, D.E., Genesereth, M.R.: Ordering conjunctive queries. Artif. Intell. 26(2), 171–215 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Santos, J., Muggleton, S. (2011). When Does It Pay Off to Use Sophisticated Entailment Engines in ILP?. In: Frasconi, P., Lisi, F.A. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6489. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21295-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21295-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21294-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21295-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics