Skip to main content

A Solution to Bipartite Drawing Problem Using Genetic Algorithm

  • Conference paper
Advances in Swarm Intelligence (ICSI 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6728))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Crossing minimization problem in a bipartite graph is a well-known NP-Complete problem. Drawing the directed/undirected graphs such that they are easy to understand and remember requires some drawing aesthetics and crossing minimization is one of them. In this paper, we investigate an intelligent evolutionary technique i.e. Genetic Algorithm (GA) for bipartite drawing problem (BDP). Two techniques GA1 and GA2 are proposed based on Genetic Algorithm. It is shown that these techniques outperform previously known heuristics e.g., MinSort (M-Sort) and BaryCenter (BC) as well as a genetic algorithm based level permutation problem (LPP), especially when applied to low density graphs. The solution is tested over various parameter values of genetic bipartite drawing problem. Experimental results show the promising capability of the proposed solution over previously known heuristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mäkinen, E., Sieranta, M.: Genetic Algorithms for Drawing Bipartite Graphs. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 53(3&4), 157–166 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bienstock, D.: Some provably hard crossing number problems. In: Proc. 8th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 253–260 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Crossing number is NP-complete. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 4, 312–316 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Tutte, W.T.: Toward a Theory of Crossing Numbers. J. Comb. Theory 8(1), 45–53 (1970)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Barth, W., Mutzel, P., Junger, M.: Simple and Efficient Bilayer Cross Counting. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications (JGAA) 8(2), 179–194 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitley D.: A Genetic Algorithm Tutorial, http://www.cs.uga.edu/~potter/CompIntell/ga_tutorial.pdf

  7. Engelbrecht, A.P.: Computational Intelligence: An Introduction. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Watkins, M.E.: A special crossing number for bipartite graphs: a research problem. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 175, 405–410 (1970)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Battista, G.D., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., Tollis, I.: Algorithms for drawing graphs: an annotated bibliography. Comp. Geometry: Theory and Applications 4, 235–282 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Koebe, M., Knöchel, J.: On the block alignment problem. J. Inf. Process. Cybern. EIK 26, 377–387 (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugiyama, K., Tagawa, S., Toda, M.: Methods for visual understanding of hierarchical system structures. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-11, 109–125 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdullah, A.: “Data Mining Using the Crossing Minimization Paradigm,” –Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Catarci, T.: The Assignment Heuristic for Crossing Reduction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 21, 515–521 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Camel, D., Irene, F.: Breaking Cycles for Minimizing Crossings. Journal of Experimental Algorithmics (JEA) 6 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stallmann, M., Brglez, F., Ghosh, D.: Heuristics, Experimental Subjects, and Treatment Evaluation in Bigraph Crossing Minimization. J. Exp. Algorithmics 6 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, L., Song, L., Eades, P.: Crossing Minimization Problems of Drawing Bipartite Graphs in Two Clusters. In: ACM Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualization, vol. 109, pp. 33–37 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ezziane, Z.: Experimental Comparison between Evolutionary Algorithm and Barycenter Heuristic for the Bipartite Drawing Problem. J. Computer Science 3(9), 717–722 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laguna, M., Marti, R., Vails, V.: Arc Crossing Minimization in Hierarchical Digraphs with Tabu Search. Computers and Op. Research 24(12), 1175–1186 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Martí, R.: Arc Crossing Minimization in Graphs with GRASP. IIE Transactions 33, 913–919 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khan, S., Bilal, M., Sharif, M., Khan, F.A. (2011). A Solution to Bipartite Drawing Problem Using Genetic Algorithm. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Chai, Y., Wang, G. (eds) Advances in Swarm Intelligence. ICSI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6728. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21515-5_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21515-5_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21514-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21515-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics