Abstract
In the last decade there has been a series of severe large scale power outages around the world. Deregulation and increasing interconnection among grids have left a complex topographical landscape of organizations and technology that spans traditional borders. Two examples are the 2003 outages in Italy and North America. Both these cases left more than fifty million people without power. As part of the European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection our team is considering how this integrated context affects the vulnerability of the power system. System dynamics modellers elicit fragmented domain expert knowledge using a group model building methodology. We present a qualitative version of the simulation model and discuss how the prevalence of long time delays, dynamic complexity and a tendency to view hazardous conditions as normal all contribute to long term crisis proneness. We argue that some common beliefs about crisis conditions actually are fallacies that must be overcome to avoid recurrent crises in the power generation and distribution sector.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
CRE and AEEG, Report on the events of September 28th, culminating in the separation of the Italian power system from the other UCTE networks. CRE & AEEG (2003)
Force, U.-C.P.S.O.T., Final Report on the August 14, Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations, US Department of Energy & Canada Ministry of Natural Resources (2003)
Roux-Dufort, C.: Is Crisis Management (Only) a Management of Exceptions. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 15(2), 106–114 (2007)
Roux-Dufort, C.: The Devil Lies in the Details! How Crises Build up Withing Organizations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 17(1), 5–11 (2009)
Turner, B.: The Organizational and Inter-organizational Development of Disasters. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(3), 378–397 (1976)
Turner, B.: Man-Made Disasters. Wykeham Publications, London (1978)
Vaughan, D.: Autonomy, Interdependence and Social Control: NASA and the Space Shuttle Challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2), 225–257 (1990)
Coombs, W.T.: Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing and Responding, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles (2007)
Jones, S., Kirchsteiger, C., Bjerke, W.: The Importance of Near Miss Reporting to Further Improve Safety Performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 12(1), 59–67 (1999)
Nielsen, K.J., Carstensen, O., Rasmussen, K.: The Prevention of Occupational Injuries in Two Industrial Plants Using an Incident Reporting Scheme. Journal of Safety Research 37(5), 479–486 (2006)
Phimister, J.R., et al.: Near-Miss Incident Management in the Chemical Process Industry. Risk Analysis 23(3), 445–459 (2003)
Sveen, F.O.: The Dynamics of Incident Reporting Systems: From Safety to Security. In: Department of Industrial Management, p. 438. San Sebastian, Tecnun (University of Navarra) (2009)
Sveen, F.O., Sarriegi, J.M., Gonzalez, J.J.C.: Incident Response and User Awareness. In: Mjølsnes, S.F. (ed.) NISK2009 - Norsk Informasjonssikkerhetskonferanse, pp. 13–26. apir Akademisk Forlag, Trondheim (2009)
Sveen, F.O., Rich, E., Jager, M.: Overcoming Organizational Challenges to Secure Knowledge Management. Information Systems Frontiers 9(5), 481–492 (2007)
ERGEG, ERGEG Final Report: The lessons to be learned from the large disturbance in the European Power System in the 4th of November 2006. In: European Regulators’ Group for Electricity and Gas (2007)
Chang, S.E., et al.: Infrastructure failure interdependencies in extreme events: power outage consequences in the 1998 Ice Storm. Natural Disasters 41, 337–358 (2007)
Andersen, D.F., Richardson, G.P.: Scripts for Group Model Building. System Dynamics Review 13(2), 107–129 (1997)
Richardson, G.P., Andersen, D.F.: Teamwork in Group Model Building. System Dynamics Review 11(2), 113–137 (1995)
Vennix, J.A.M.: Group Model Building: Facilitating team learning using System Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1996)
Forrester, J.W.: Industrial Dynamics. Productivity Press, Cambridge (1961)
Richardson, G.P., Pugh III, A.L.: Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO. Productivity Press, Cambridge (1981)
Sterman, J.D.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)
Johnson, C.: Failure in Safety-Critical Systems: A Handbook of Incident and Accident Reporting. Glasgow University Press, Glasgow (2003)
Schulman, P., et al.: High Reliability and the Management of Critical Infrastructures. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 12(1), 14–28 (2004)
Palm, J.: Emergency Management in the Swedish Electricity Grid from a Household Perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 17(1), 55–63 (2009)
Cooke, D.L.: A System Dynamics analysis of the Westray mine disaster. System Dynamics Review 19, 139–166 (2003)
Gal-Or, E., Ghose, A.: The Economic Incentives for Sharing Security Information. Information Systems Research 16(2), 186–208 (2005)
Cooke, D.L., Rohleder, T.R.: Learning from Incidents: from Normal Accidents to High Reliability. System Dynamics Review 22(3), 213–239 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sveen, F.O., Hernantes, J., Gonzalez, J.J., Rich, E. (2011). Towards Understanding Recurring Large Scale Power Outages: An Endogenous View of Inter-organizational Effects. In: Xenakis, C., Wolthusen, S. (eds) Critical Information Infrastructures Security. CRITIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6712. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21694-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21694-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21693-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21694-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)