Skip to main content

Towards Understanding Recurring Large Scale Power Outages: An Endogenous View of Inter-organizational Effects

  • Conference paper
Critical Information Infrastructures Security (CRITIS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 6712))

Abstract

In the last decade there has been a series of severe large scale power outages around the world. Deregulation and increasing interconnection among grids have left a complex topographical landscape of organizations and technology that spans traditional borders. Two examples are the 2003 outages in Italy and North America. Both these cases left more than fifty million people without power. As part of the European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection our team is considering how this integrated context affects the vulnerability of the power system. System dynamics modellers elicit fragmented domain expert knowledge using a group model building methodology. We present a qualitative version of the simulation model and discuss how the prevalence of long time delays, dynamic complexity and a tendency to view hazardous conditions as normal all contribute to long term crisis proneness. We argue that some common beliefs about crisis conditions actually are fallacies that must be overcome to avoid recurrent crises in the power generation and distribution sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CRE and AEEG, Report on the events of September 28th, culminating in the separation of the Italian power system from the other UCTE networks. CRE & AEEG (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Force, U.-C.P.S.O.T., Final Report on the August 14, Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations, US Department of Energy & Canada Ministry of Natural Resources (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roux-Dufort, C.: Is Crisis Management (Only) a Management of Exceptions. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 15(2), 106–114 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roux-Dufort, C.: The Devil Lies in the Details! How Crises Build up Withing Organizations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 17(1), 5–11 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Turner, B.: The Organizational and Inter-organizational Development of Disasters. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(3), 378–397 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner, B.: Man-Made Disasters. Wykeham Publications, London (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vaughan, D.: Autonomy, Interdependence and Social Control: NASA and the Space Shuttle Challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2), 225–257 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coombs, W.T.: Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing and Responding, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, S., Kirchsteiger, C., Bjerke, W.: The Importance of Near Miss Reporting to Further Improve Safety Performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 12(1), 59–67 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen, K.J., Carstensen, O., Rasmussen, K.: The Prevention of Occupational Injuries in Two Industrial Plants Using an Incident Reporting Scheme. Journal of Safety Research 37(5), 479–486 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phimister, J.R., et al.: Near-Miss Incident Management in the Chemical Process Industry. Risk Analysis 23(3), 445–459 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sveen, F.O.: The Dynamics of Incident Reporting Systems: From Safety to Security. In: Department of Industrial Management, p. 438. San Sebastian, Tecnun (University of Navarra) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sveen, F.O., Sarriegi, J.M., Gonzalez, J.J.C.: Incident Response and User Awareness. In: Mjølsnes, S.F. (ed.) NISK2009 - Norsk Informasjonssikkerhetskonferanse, pp. 13–26. apir Akademisk Forlag, Trondheim (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sveen, F.O., Rich, E., Jager, M.: Overcoming Organizational Challenges to Secure Knowledge Management. Information Systems Frontiers 9(5), 481–492 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ERGEG, ERGEG Final Report: The lessons to be learned from the large disturbance in the European Power System in the 4th of November 2006. In: European Regulators’ Group for Electricity and Gas (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, S.E., et al.: Infrastructure failure interdependencies in extreme events: power outage consequences in the 1998 Ice Storm. Natural Disasters 41, 337–358 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Andersen, D.F., Richardson, G.P.: Scripts for Group Model Building. System Dynamics Review 13(2), 107–129 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Richardson, G.P., Andersen, D.F.: Teamwork in Group Model Building. System Dynamics Review 11(2), 113–137 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vennix, J.A.M.: Group Model Building: Facilitating team learning using System Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Forrester, J.W.: Industrial Dynamics. Productivity Press, Cambridge (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson, G.P., Pugh III, A.L.: Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO. Productivity Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sterman, J.D.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson, C.: Failure in Safety-Critical Systems: A Handbook of Incident and Accident Reporting. Glasgow University Press, Glasgow (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schulman, P., et al.: High Reliability and the Management of Critical Infrastructures. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 12(1), 14–28 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Palm, J.: Emergency Management in the Swedish Electricity Grid from a Household Perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 17(1), 55–63 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooke, D.L.: A System Dynamics analysis of the Westray mine disaster. System Dynamics Review 19, 139–166 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gal-Or, E., Ghose, A.: The Economic Incentives for Sharing Security Information. Information Systems Research 16(2), 186–208 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cooke, D.L., Rohleder, T.R.: Learning from Incidents: from Normal Accidents to High Reliability. System Dynamics Review 22(3), 213–239 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christos Xenakis Stephen Wolthusen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sveen, F.O., Hernantes, J., Gonzalez, J.J., Rich, E. (2011). Towards Understanding Recurring Large Scale Power Outages: An Endogenous View of Inter-organizational Effects. In: Xenakis, C., Wolthusen, S. (eds) Critical Information Infrastructures Security. CRITIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6712. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21694-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21694-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21693-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21694-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics