Abstract
Kurt Lewin’s statement “There is nothing more practical than a good theory” says not so much about what is good for practice, but rather what it means to have a good theory. There exist a number of competing theories in the business process domain. The current paper is devoted to one of those that lie outside the mainstream direction. The purpose of the paper is not to present the theory as such, but to present the stages of how it was developed with the aim of becoming a “good” theory from the practical point of view. The paper is written as an experience report and goes through different stages of the development where research efforts where intermixed with practical tests. The theory in question is the state-oriented view on business processes. The basic idea of this theory lies in application of the general principles of the theory of dynamic systems to the business domain. The main direction for practical application of theoretical results is the development of IT-support for loosely structured business processes. Besides giving the history of the related research and practical efforts, the paper discusses the lessons learned that can be of interest for the development of other theoretical models/views in the business process domain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lewin, K.: Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. Tavistock, London (1952)
Feyman, R.P.: Nobel Lecture, December 11 (1965), http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html
Meyrowitz, N., van Dam, A.: Interactive Editing Systems. ACM Computing Surveys 14(3), 321–415 (1982)
Bider, I., Khomyakov, M., Pushchinsky, E.: Logic of change: Semantics of object systems with active relations. Automated Software Engineering (ASE) 7(1), 9–37 (2000)
Bider, I., Khomyakov, M.: New technology - Great Opportunities. How to Exploit Them. In: Filipe, J. (ed.) Enterprise Information Systems IV, pp. 11–20. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)
Bider, I.: State-oriented business process modeling: principles, theory and practice. PhD thesis, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm (2002)
Bider, I.: Developing tool support for process oriented management. In: Handbook of Systems Development, vol. 1999, pp. 205–222. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998)
Bider, I.: Object driver: a method for analysis, design, and implementation of interactive applications. In: Handbook of Systems Development, vol. 1999, pp. 81–96. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998)
Bider, I., Khomyakov, M.: Object-oriented model for representing software production processes. In: Dannenberg, R.B., Mitchell, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 1357, pp. 319–322. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Kalman, R.E., Falb, P.L., Arbib, M.A.: Topics in Mathematical System Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1969)
Khomyakov, M., Bider, I.: Achieving Workflow Flexibility through Taming the Chaos. In: OOIS 2000-6th International Conference on Object Oriented Information Systems, pp. 85–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Andersson, B., Bider, I., Johannesson, P., Perjons, E.: Towards a Formal Definition of Goal-Oriented Business Process Patterns. BPMJ 11(6), 650–662 (2005)
Regev, G., Bider, I., Wegmann, A.: Defining Business Process Flexibility with the help of Invariants. SPIP 12(1), 65–79 (2007)
Bider, I., Striy, A.: Controlling business process instance flexibility via rules of planning. IJBPIM 3(1), 15–25 (2008)
Andersson, T., Andersson-Ceder, A., Bider, I.: State Flow as a Way of Analyzing Business Processes – Case Studies. Logistics Information Management 15(1), 34–45 (2002)
Perjons, E., Bider, I., Andersson, B.: Building and Exploiting a Business Process Model for Lobbying: Experience Report. Communications of the IIMA (CIIMA) 7(3), 1–14 (2007)
Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Evaluating Adequacy of Business Process Modeling Approaches. In: Handbook of Research on Complex Dynamic Process Management: Techniques for Adaptability in Turbulent Environments, pp. 79–102. IGI (2009)
Andersson, T., Bider, I., Svensson, R.: Aligning people to business processes experience report. Software Process Improvement and Practice (SPIP) 10(4), 403–413 (2005)
Bider, I., Perjons, E., Johannesson, P.: In Search of the Holy Grail: Integrating social software with BPM. In: Experience Report, Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Bider, I., Perjons, E., Johannesson, P.: A strategy for integrating social software with business process support. LNBIP, vol. 66, p. 12. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
iPB Reference Manual on-line documentation, http://docs.ibissoft.se/node/3. [Online] (accessed June 20, 2010)
Weinberg, G.M.: An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Dorset House, New York (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bider, I. (2011). In Search for a Good Theory: Commuting between Research and Practice in Business Process Domain. In: Halpin, T., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2011 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 81. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21758-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21759-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)