Skip to main content

Overlaying Conceptualizations for Managing Complexity of Scenario Specifications

  • Conference paper
Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2011, EMMSAD 2011)

Abstract

Most conventional conceptual modeling approaches are not putting into a foreground interaction dependencies between actors. This is one of the main reasons why it is difficult to apply them for managing complexity of conceptual representations. The goal of this paper is to present conceptual modeling method, which allows constructing graphical representations of scenarios with a more comprehensible structure. Using simple interaction loops between organizational and technical components help designers to separate crosscutting concerns in system engineering without the requirement to specify a complete solution. The examples of sequential, iterative, parallel and alternative behavior are analyzed to demonstrate conceptual descriptions of use-case scenarios. The overlaying and underlying interaction loops among actors are easier to understand, extend and maintain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gane, C., Sarson, T.: Structured System Analysis. Prentice-Hall, NJ (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yourdon, E., Constantine, L.L.: Structured Design. Prentice-Hall, NJ (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. OMG. Unified Modeling Language Superstructure, version 2.2 (2010) , www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/ (retrieved January 19, 2010)

  4. Snoeck, M., Dedene, G., Verhelst, M., Depuydt, A.M.: Object-Oriented Enterprise Modelling with MERODE. Leuven University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson, I., Ng, P.-W.: Aspect-Oriented Software Development with Use Cases. Pearson, Pennsylvania (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., van Vliet, H.: Business modelling is not process modelling. In: Mayr, H.C., Liddle, S.W., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER Workshops 2000. LNCS, vol. 1921, pp. 40–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner, G.: The Agent-Object-Relationship Metamodel: Towards Unified View of State and Behaviour. Information Systems 28, 5 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz, J.L.G.: DEMO: Towards a Discipline of Organisation Engineering. European Journal of Operational Research, 351–363 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zachman, J.A.: A Framework for Information System Architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26(3) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glinz, M.: Problems and Deficiencies of UML as a Requirements Specification Language. In: Proc. of the 10-th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, San Diego, pp. 11–22 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dori, D.: Object-Process Methodology: A Holistic System Paradigm. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Denning, P.J., Medina-Mora, R.: Completing the Loops. Interfaces 25, 42–57 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gustas, R.: Conceptual Modeling and Integration of Static and Dynamic Aspects of Service Architectures. In: International Workshop on Ontology, Conceptualization and Epistemology for Information Systems, Software Engineering and Service Sciences, Hammamet, Tunisia, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gustas, R., Gustiene, P.: Pragmatic – Driven Approach for Service-Oriented Analysis and Design. In: Information Systems Engineering - from Data Analysis to Process Networks. IGI Global, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrario, R., Guarino, N.: Towards an Ontological Foundation for Services Science. In: Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Traverso, P. (eds.) FIS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5468, pp. 152–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gustas, R.: Modeling Approach for Integration and Evolution of Information System Conceptualizations. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design 2(1), 45–73 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Winograd, T., Flores, R.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Ablex Norwood, N.J. (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evermann, J., Wand, Y.: Ontology Based Object-Oriented Domain Modeling: Representing Behavior. Journal of Database Management 20(1), 48–77 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bunge, M.A.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: A World of Systems, vol. 4. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gustas, R. (2011). Overlaying Conceptualizations for Managing Complexity of Scenario Specifications. In: Halpin, T., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2011 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 81. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21758-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21759-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics