Skip to main content

Sentiment-Oriented Summarisation of Peer Reviews

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6738))

Abstract

It is common that students peer-review other students’ writing, and these reviews are useful information to instructors, both on the particulars of the essay being reviewed, the feedback provided and the overall progress of the class. This paper describes a novel approach to summarising feedback in academic essay writing. We present a summarisation method for identifying and extracting representative opinion sentences from each feedback. Sentiment score-based techniques are employed and SentiWordNet is used as a linguistic lexical resource for sentiment summarisation. We evaluate our approach with the reviews written by a group of 50 engineering students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cho, K., Schunn, C.D., Charney, D.: Commenting on Writing: Typology and Perceived Helpfulness of Comments from Novice Peer Reviewers and Subject Matter Experts. Written Communication 23, 260–294 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mihalcea, R., Hassan, S.: Using the Essence of Texts to Improve Document Classification. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SENTIWORDNET 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC 2010, pp. 2200–2204 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Luhn, H.P.: The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development 2, 159–165 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Calvo, R.A., O’Rourke, S.T., Jones, J., Yacef, K., Reimann, P.: Collaborative Writing Support Tools on the Cloud. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4, 88–97 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Louis, A., Nenkova, A.: Automatic Summary Evaluation without Human Models. In: Proceedings of the Text Analysing Conference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pang, B., Lee, L.: A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts. In: 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 271–278 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, S.M., Calvo, R.A. (2011). Sentiment-Oriented Summarisation of Peer Reviews. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6738. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_79

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_79

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21868-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21869-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics