Skip to main content

A Formal Argumentation Framework for Deliberation Dialogues

  • Conference paper
Book cover Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6614))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Agents engage in deliberation dialogues to collectively decide on a course of action. To solve conflicts of opinion that arise, they can question claims and supply arguments. Existing models fail to capture the interplay between the provided arguments as well as successively selecting a winner from the proposals. This paper introduces a general framework for agent deliberation dialogues that uses an explicit reply structure to produce coherent dialogues, guides in outcome selection and provide pointers for agent strategies.

Category: I.2.11 [Artificial Intelligence] Distributed Artificial Intelligence— Languages and structures, multi-agent systems.

General Terms: Design, Languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence 173(3-4), 413–436 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., McBurney, P.: A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11(2), 153–171 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Black, E., Atkinson, K.: Dialogues that account for different perspectives in collaborative argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 867–874 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. McBurney, P., Hitchcock, D., Parsons, S.: The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 22(1), 95–132 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy, pp. 402–409 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 173(9-10), 901–934 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: Properties and complexity of some formal inter-agent dialogues. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 347–376 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pini, M.S., Rossi, F., Venable, K.B., Walsh, T.: Aggregating Partially Ordered Preferences. Journal of Logic and Computation 19(3), 475–502 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Prakken, H.: Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(6), 1009–1040 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument and Computation 1(2) ((to appear, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tang, Y., Parsons, S.: Argumentation-based dialogues for deliberation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 552–559. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tolchinsky, P., Atkinson, K., McBurney, P., Modgil, S., Cortés, U.: Agents deliberating over action proposals using the proCLAIM model. In: Burkhard, H.-D., Lindemann, G., Verbrugge, R., Varga, L.Z. (eds.) CEEMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4696, pp. 32–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. van der Weide, T.L., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.C., Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.A.W.: Practical reasoning using values. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Maudet, N. (eds.) ArgMAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 6057, pp. 79–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kok, E.M., Meyer, JJ.C., Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2011). A Formal Argumentation Framework for Deliberation Dialogues. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6614. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21939-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21940-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics