Skip to main content

Using Properties to Compare Both Words and Clauses

  • Conference paper
Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications (KES-AMSTA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6682))

  • 1779 Accesses

Abstract

There are many applications that use the semantic similarity of words to compare input to stored data, such as conversational agents. When a human thinks of a word they consider a meaning which has associated attributes and properties. Clauses allow words to combine together to form a single meaning. This fact allows words and clauses to be treated in the same way as a collection of properties expressed as words. In this paper, a novel mechanism is proposed to allow the similarity between two ideas expressed as properties to be found. An investigation using definitions as the source of information showed that the new method gives strong correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goldstone, R.L., Son, J.: Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Larkey, L., Markman, A.B.: Processes of similarity judgement. Cognitive Science 29(6), 1061–1076 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taggart, C., Wines, J.A.: My Grammar and I (or should that be ‘Me’?). Michael O’Mara Books Limited (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quirk, R.: The Use of English, 2nd edn. Longman, Harlow (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Shea, K., Bandar, Z., Crockett, K.: A Conversational Agent Framework using Semantic Analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Computing Research (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Achananuparp, P., Hu, X., Shen, X.: The evaluation of sentence similarity measures. In: Song, I.-Y., Eder, J., Nguyen, T.M. (eds.) DaWaK 2008. LNCS, vol. 5182, pp. 305–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating WordNet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Computational Linguistics 32(1), 13–47 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Landauer, G.W.F.T.K., Harshman, R.: Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25, 259–264 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Islam, A., Inkpen, D.: Semantic text similarity using corpus-based word similarity and string similarity. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 2(2), 1–25 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet an Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Y., Bandar, Z., McLean, D., O’Shea, J., Crockett, K.: Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus stastics. IEEE Knowledge and Data Engineering (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tsatsaronis, G., Varlamis, I., Vazirgiannis, M.: Text relatedness based on a word thesaurus. J. Artif. Intell. Res (JAIR) 37, 1–39 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G.: Resolving terminological heterogeneity in ontologies. In: Proceedings of the ECAI Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Interoperability (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Assem, M., Gangemi, A., Schreiber, G.: Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, Y., Bandar, Z., McLean, D.: An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Knowledge and Data Engineering (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zesch, T., Gurevych, I.: Wisdom of crowds versus wisdom of linguists - measuring the semantic relatedness of words. Natural Language Engineering 16(01), 25–59 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Microsoft Encarta English Dictionary. Microsoft Corporation, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rubenstein, H., Goodenough, J.B.: Contextual correlates of synonymy. Comm. ACM 8, 627–633 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, 265–283 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zesch, T., Gurevych, I.: Analysis of the Wikipedia category graph for NLP applications. In: Proceedings of the TextGraphs-2 Association for Computational Linguistics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alvarez, M.A., Lim, S.: A Graph Modeling of Semantic Similarity between Words. In: 1st IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, pp. 355–362 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes 6(1), 1–28 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang, J., Conrath, D.: Semantic Similarity Based on Corpus Statistics and Lexical Taxonomy. In: Procedings of Research in Computational Linguistics, Taiwan (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hliaoutakis, A., Varelas, G., Voutsakis, E., Petrakis, E.G.M., Milios, E.: Information retrieval by semantic similarity. Int. Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 2(3), 55–73 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pearce, D.M., Bandar, Z., Mclean, D. (2011). Using Properties to Compare Both Words and Clauses. In: O’Shea, J., Nguyen, N.T., Crockett, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6682. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22000-5_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22000-5_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21999-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22000-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics