Skip to main content

Answer Set Programming for Computing Decisions Under Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6717))

Abstract

Possibility theory offers a qualitative framework for modeling decision under uncertainty. In this setting, pessimistic and optimistic decision criteria have been formally justified. The computation by means of possibilistic logic inference of optimal decisions according to such criteria has been proposed. This paper presents an Answer Set Programming (ASP)-based methodology for modeling decision problems and computing optimal decisions in the sense of the possibilistic criteria. This is achieved by applying both a classic and a possibilistic ASP-based methodology in order to handle both a knowledge base pervaded with uncertainty and a prioritized preference base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baral, C.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brewka, G.: Answer Sets and Qualitative Decision Making. Synthese 146(1-2), 171–187 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brewka, G.: Answer Sets and Qualitative Optimization. Logic Journal of the IGPL 14(3), 413–433 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brewka, G., Niemelä, I., Syrjänen, T.: Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction. Computational Intelligence 20(2), 333–357 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewka, G., Niemelä, I., Truszczynski, M.: Answer Set Optimization. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.) 18th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003), pp. 867–872. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Confalonieri, R., Nieves, J.C., Osorio, M., Vázquez-Salceda, J.: Possibilistic Semantics for Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds.) FoIKS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5956, pp. 133–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Confalonieri, R., Prade, H., Nieves, J.C.: Handling Exceptions in Logic Programming without Negation as Failure. Accepted in the 11th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Possibilistic Logic. In: Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, pp. 439–513. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Prade, H., Perny, P.: Qualitative decision theory: from Savage’s axioms to nonmonotonic reasoning. J. ACM 49(4), 455–495 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois, D., Le Berre, D., Prade, H., Sabbadin, R.: Using Possibilistic Logic for Modeling Qualitative Decision: ATMS-based Algorithms. Fundamenta Informaticae 37(1-2), 1–30 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In: 14th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), pp. 1924–1930. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Sabbadin, R.: Decision-theoretic foundations of qualitative possibility theory. Europ. Journal of Operational Research 128(3), 459–478 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Sabbadin, R.: A Possibilistic Logic Machinery for Qualitative Decision. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning, pp. 47–54. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grabos, R.: Qualitative model of decision making. In: Bussler, C.J., Fensel, D. (eds.) AIMSA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3192, pp. 480–489. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolas, P., Garcia, L., Stéphan, I., Lefèvre, C.: Possibilistic uncertainty handling for answer set programming. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 47(1-2), 139–181 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabbadin, R.: Decision As Abduction? In: Prade, H. (ed.) Proceedings of 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 600–604. Wiley, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Confalonieri, R., Prade, H. (2011). Answer Set Programming for Computing Decisions Under Uncertainty. In: Liu, W. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6717. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22151-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22152-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics