Skip to main content

Motivation and Empowerment in Process Improvement

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 172))

Abstract

Clarity in goals, tasks, and responsibilities empowers employees to undertake an organizational change. Assessing processes prior to process improvement allows high involvement in setting the improvement goals, awareness of the organization’s business goals, and understanding the roles and responsibilities in process improvement. This study describes the results of an international survey about goal internalization, motivation, and empowerment in process improvement. The results indicate that process assessment contributes to the goal internalization of process improvement. However, process assessment alone does not contribute extensively to the empowerment and motivation of employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arent, J.: Transforming Software Organizations with the Capability Maturity Model. In: Bomarius, F., Oivo, M. (eds.) PROFES 2000. LNCS, vol. 1840, pp. 103–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Lepasaar, M., Varkoi, T., Jaakkola, H.: Models and success factors of process change. In: Bomarius, F., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds.) PROFES 2001. LNCS, vol. 2188, p. 68. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Paulk, M.C., Weber, C.V., Chrissis, M.B.: The Capability Maturity Model for Software. In: Elements of Software Process Assessment and Improvement, pp. 3–15. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Varkoi, T.: Software Process Improvement Priorities in Small Enterprises. In: Information Technology. Licentiate of Technology. Tampere University of Technology, Pori (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Humphrey, S.W.: Managing the Software Process, Software Engineering Institute (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grover, V.: From Business Reengineering to Business Process Change Management: A Longitudinal Study of Trends and Practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 46, 36–46 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement - Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morten Korsaa, M.B., Messnarz, R., Johansen, J., Vohwinkel, D., Nevalainen, R., Schweigert, T.: The SPI manifesto and the ECQA SPI manager certification scheme. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bo, Y.: Influence of Organizational Boundary on Psychological Empowerment in Multi-organization Network. In: Maoshan, Q. (ed.), vol. 5, pp. 195–198 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spreitzer, G.M.: Toward a common ground in defining empowerment. Research in Organizational Change and Development 10, 31–62 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menon, S.T.: Psychological Empowerment: Definition, Measurement and Validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 31(3), 161–164 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baddoo, N.a.H.: Tracy: Motivators of Software Process Improvement: an Analysis of Practitioners’ Views. Journal of Systems and Software 62, 85–96 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spreitzer, G.M.: Social Structural Characteristics of Psychological Empowerment. Academy of Management Journal 39, 11 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tracy Hall, H.S., Beecham, S., Baddoo, N., Robinson, H.: What Do We Know about Developer Motivation? IEEE Software, 92–94 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barafort, B., Di Renzo, B., Merlan, O.: Benefits resulting from the combined use of ISO/IEC 15504 with the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL). In: Product Focused Software Process Improvement (SPI 2002). Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones, C.: The economics of software process improvement. Computer 29(1), 95–97 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss D.M., Bennett, D., Payseur, J.Y., Tendick, P., Zhang, P.: Goal-Oriented Software Assessment. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 221–231 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lepmets, M., Ras, E. (2011). Motivation and Empowerment in Process Improvement. In: O‘Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Service Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 172. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22205-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22206-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics