Skip to main content

Monitoring Contributions Online: A Reputation System to Model Expertise in Online Communities

  • Conference paper
User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization (UMAP 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6787))

  • 4281 Accesses

Abstract

This document contains a brief description of my PhD research, with problem definition, contribution to the field of reputation systems and user modeling, and proposed solution. The proposed method and algorithm enable evaluation of contributions in online knowledge-based communities. The innovation in the approach is the use of authority and specifying reputation on the keyword-level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agichtein, E., et al.: Finding high-quality content in social media. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, WSDM 2008, p. 183 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, R., Vassileva, J.: Design and evaluation of an adaptive incentive mechanism for sustained educational online communities. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16(3-4), 321–348 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson, C.N., Goldberg, D.T.: The future of learning institutions in a digital age. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Drachsler, H., et al.: Personal recommender systems for learners in lifelong learning networks: the requirements, techniques and model. International Journal of Learning Technology 3(4), 404–423 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farmer, F.R., Glass, B.: Building Web Reputation Systems. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gal-Oz, N., et al.: Cross-Community Reputation: Policies and alternatives. In: IADIS Int. Conf. on Web Based Communities (WBC 2008), pp. 197–201 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Golbeck, J., Hendler, J.: Accuracy of Metrics for Inferring Trust and Reputation in Semantic Web-based Social Networks. LNCS (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hennis, T., et al.: Reputation in peer-based learning environments (in print). In: Santos, O.C., Boticario, J.G. (eds.) Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies, IGI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huizing, A.: The value of a rose: rising above objectivism and subjectivism. Working Papers on Information Systems 7(11), 25 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jøsang, A.: Trust and reputation systems. In: Aldini, R., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) Foundations of Security Analysis and Design, vol. 2006, pp. 209–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamvar, S.D., et al.: The Eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. In: WWW 2003, pp. 640–651. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kleanthous, S., Dimitrova, V.: Analyzing community knowledge sharing behavior. In: De Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 231–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. McLure-Wasko, M., Faraj, S.: Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly 29(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore, T.D., Serva, M.A.: Understanding member motivation for contributing to different types of virtual communities: a proposed framework. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research: The Global Information Technology Workforce, pp. 153–158. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Resnick, P., et al.: Reputation Systems. Communications of the ACM 43(12), 45–48 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(1), 33–60 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Squazzoni, F.: Review of Reputation in Artificial Societies: Social Beliefs for Social Order, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/3/reviews/squazzoni.html

  18. Tuomi, I.: Learning in the Age of Networked Intelligence. European Journal of Education 42(2), 235–254 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vu, L.-H., et al.: Synergies of Different Reputation Systems: Challenges and Opportunities. In: 2009 World Congress on Privacy, Security, Trust and the Management of e-Business, pp. 218–226. IEEE Computer Society, Saint John (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hennis, T. (2011). Monitoring Contributions Online: A Reputation System to Model Expertise in Online Communities. In: Konstan, J.A., Conejo, R., Marzo, J.L., Oliver, N. (eds) User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization. UMAP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6787. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22361-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22362-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics